Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 9.5 | – | 10.5 | – | 5.7 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 22.2 | 0.1 | 37.7 | – | 37.5 | 0.3 |
| Maine | S | S | 44.1 | – | 42.9 | – |
| Massachusetts | 26.6 | 0.2 | 38.7 | – | 39.2 | 0.2 |
| New Hampshire | 48.1 | – | S | S | S | S |
| RhodeIsland | 36.6 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Vermont | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 44.4 | 0.4 | S | S | S | S |
| New York | 34.6 | 0.4 | 35.5 | 0.3 | 35.9 | 0.6 |
| Pennsylvania | 14.4 | 0.3 | 19.0 | 0.4 | 19.7 | 1.0 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 13.4 | 0.4 | 10.6 | 0.3 | 10.0 | 0.4 |
| Indiana | 19.1 | 0.3 | 12.7 | 0.2 | 11.8 | 0.2 |
| Michigan | 14.2 | 0.2 | 15.7 | 0.1 | 15.2 | 0.2 |
| Ohio | 13.4 | 0.3 | 20.9 | 0.5 | 20.8 | 1.3 |
| Wisconsin | 12.2 | 0.2 | 20.2 | 0.1 | 20.7 | 0.3 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 16.9 | 0.1 | 21.5 | – | 26.7 | 0.1 |
| Kansas | 31.6 | 0.6 | 23.1 | 0.2 | 22.9 | 0.1 |
| Minnesota | S | S | 21.4 | – | 19.0 | 0.2 |
| Missouri | 18.7 | 0.8 | 19.9 | 0.6 | 25.1 | 1.0 |
| Nebraska | 27.7 | 0.2 | S | S | S | S |
| North Dakota | S | S | 39.6 | – | 40.9 | 0.1 |
| South Dakota | 35.6 | – | 38.1 | – | 37.2 | – |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | 41.3 | – | S | S | S | S |
| District of Columbia | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Florida | 25.3 | 0.6 | S | S | S | S |
| Georgia | 14.5 | 0.3 | 19.7 | 0.4 | 19.7 | 0.4 |
| Maryland | 25.7 | 0.1 | 23.2 | – | 24.1 | 0.1 |
| North Carolina | 26.0 | 0.3 | 24.1 | 0.1 | 25.6 | 0.4 |
| South Carolina | 17.7 | 0.1 | 22.0 | 0.1 | 21.9 | 0.2 |
| Virginia | 44.5 | 1.0 | S | S | S | S |
| West Virginia | 29.7 | – | 31.7 | – | 35.4 | 0.1 |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 20.0 | 0.4 | 15.8 | 0.2 | 16.1 | 0.3 |
| Kentucky | 9.7 | 0.1 | 12.1 | 0.1 | 17.9 | 0.2 |
| Mississippi | 20.3 | 0.9 | 28.0 | 0.9 | 29.3 | 0.9 |
| Tennessee | 15.4 | 0.4 | 23.3 | 1.4 | 15.6 | 0.6 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | 18.1 | 3.3 | 17.6 | 4.4 | 19.3 | 1.7 |
| Louisiana | 16.9 | 0.3 | 35.7 | 1.8 | 23.5 | 1.8 |
| Oklahoma | 21.0 | 0.8 | 29.5 | 1.0 | 21.8 | 0.5 |
| Texas | 14.3 | 1.0 | 16.4 | 1.0 | 13.3 | 1.0 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 13.7 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Colorado | 45.4 | 0.6 | 23.2 | 0.1 | 23.3 | 0.3 |
| Idaho | 49.8 | – | 40.9 | – | 41.6 | – |
| Montana | S | S | 25.2 | – | 25.3 | – |
| Nevada | 22.4 | – | 24.3 | – | 24.9 | 0.1 |
| New Mexico | 33.1 | – | 30.6 | – | 29.5 | – |
| Utah | S | S | 29.3 | – | 28.8 | 0.1 |
| Wyoming | 39.4 | – | S | S | S | S |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| California | 39.0 | 1.9 | 19.4 | 0.5 | 20.4 | 1.6 |
| Hawaii | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Oregon | 35.7 | 0.1 | 39.4 | – | 39.2 | 0.4 |
| Washington | 30.3 | 0.3 | 30.9 | 0.2 | 31.6 | 0.8 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.