Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 8.8 | – | 17.3 | – | 8.4 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 11.5 | 2.5 | 22.0 | 3.1 | 12.1 | 1.7 |
| Maine | 21.3 | 0.2 | 28.6 | 0.1 | 25.2 | 0.2 |
| Massachusetts | 17.0 | 1.0 | 14.1 | 1.0 | 21.7 | 1.0 |
| New Hampshire | 20.9 | 0.3 | 17.6 | 0.2 | 19.4 | 0.2 |
| RhodeIsland | 20.9 | 0.3 | 23.2 | 0.4 | 24.9 | 0.3 |
| Vermont | 19.9 | 0.1 | 20.3 | – | 19.8 | – |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 20.0 | 1.5 | 23.3 | 0.7 | 14.5 | 0.6 |
| New York | 20.8 | 1.5 | 18.3 | 1.1 | 15.7 | 0.8 |
| Pennsylvania | 12.6 | 0.3 | 13.2 | 0.2 | 12.3 | 0.3 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 20.8 | 0.4 | 16.8 | 0.1 | 16.5 | 0.7 |
| Indiana | 13.8 | 0.2 | 15.7 | – | 15.9 | 0.5 |
| Michigan | 15.7 | 0.3 | 18.8 | – | 19.9 | 0.4 |
| Ohio | 20.0 | 0.5 | 20.2 | 0.2 | 20.1 | 0.8 |
| Wisconsin | 28.3 | 0.3 | 32.3 | – | 32.1 | 0.4 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 39.1 | 0.3 | S | S | S | S |
| Kansas | 26.3 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Minnesota | 37.1 | 0.5 | 32.3 | – | 33.0 | 0.7 |
| Missouri | 20.4 | 0.1 | 24.2 | – | 24.3 | 0.5 |
| Nebraska | 30.1 | – | 44.7 | – | 46.3 | – |
| North Dakota | 30.5 | – | 45.5 | – | 45.6 | – |
| South Dakota | 24.3 | – | 44.4 | – | 44.2 | – |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | S | S | 30.3 | – | 31.1 | – |
| District of Columbia | 35.9 | – | 32.8 | – | 32.9 | – |
| Florida | 11.7 | 0.3 | 33.9 | – | 34.5 | 1.0 |
| Georgia | 22.4 | 0.4 | 32.0 | – | 32.8 | 0.5 |
| Maryland | 33.0 | 0.5 | 20.8 | – | 17.2 | 0.3 |
| North Carolina | 32.8 | 0.4 | 36.6 | 0.2 | 39.8 | 1.2 |
| South Carolina | 44.6 | 0.2 | 45.2 | – | 48.7 | 0.8 |
| Virginia | 16.2 | 0.1 | 17.7 | – | 19.0 | 0.2 |
| West Virginia | S | S | 46.1 | – | 48.4 | – |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 33.7 | 0.2 | 31.9 | – | 32.3 | 0.3 |
| Kentucky | 23.5 | 0.1 | 18.7 | – | 18.6 | 0.2 |
| Mississippi | 21.3 | – | 30.6 | – | 33.6 | 0.3 |
| Tennessee | 23.8 | 0.3 | 26.5 | – | 30.1 | 0.7 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | S | S | 40.0 | – | 39.8 | 0.2 |
| Louisiana | 27.0 | – | 35.3 | – | 35.1 | – |
| Oklahoma | 36.5 | 0.1 | 30.6 | – | 30.6 | 0.2 |
| Texas | 13.7 | 0.5 | 14.1 | – | 13.5 | 0.8 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 20.3 | – | 17.4 | – | 17.5 | 0.3 |
| Colorado | 29.1 | 0.3 | 18.4 | – | 18.2 | 0.2 |
| Idaho | 30.8 | – | 47.1 | – | 47.0 | 0.1 |
| Montana | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Nevada | 23.0 | – | 26.2 | – | 26.5 | 0.2 |
| New Mexico | S | S | 40.5 | – | 40.6 | 0.2 |
| Utah | 30.1 | 0.1 | S | S | S | S |
| Wyoming | 48.2 | – | S | S | S | S |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | S | S | 48.6 | – | 49.4 | – |
| California | 14.7 | 0.5 | 11.9 | – | 12.2 | 1.3 |
| Hawaii | 34.7 | – | 44.3 | – | 44.4 | – |
| Oregon | 42.6 | – | 42.9 | – | 44.3 | 0.3 |
| Washington | 21.9 | – | 16.7 | – | 16.6 | 0.1 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.