Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 40.9 | – | 46.0 | – | 29.4 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Maine | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Massachusetts | 46.5 | – | S | S | S | S |
| New Hampshire | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| RhodeIsland | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Vermont | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| New York | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Pennsylvania | 34.7 | 0.2 | 28.2 | 0.5 | 29.5 | 1.0 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Indiana | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Michigan | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Ohio | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Wisconsin | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Kansas | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Minnesota | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Missouri | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Nebraska | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| North Dakota | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| South Dakota | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | 48.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| District of Columbia | 15.5 | 13.5 | S | S | 46.2 | 9.8 |
| Florida | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Georgia | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Maryland | 39.5 | 3.2 | 36.5 | 5.3 | S | S |
| North Carolina | S | S | 39.4 | 1.3 | 40.2 | 3.0 |
| South Carolina | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Virginia | S | S | S | S | 39.8 | 5.7 |
| West Virginia | S | S | 47.0 | – | 48.6 | – |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Kentucky | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Mississippi | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Tennessee | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Louisiana | S | S | S | S | 49.2 | – |
| Oklahoma | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Texas | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Colorado | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Idaho | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Montana | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Nevada | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| New Mexico | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Utah | 45.8 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Wyoming | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| California | 42.1 | 0.2 | S | S | S | S |
| Hawaii | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Oregon | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Washington | S | S | S | S | S | S |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.