Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 6.9 | – | 11.8 | – | 9.4 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 33.7 | 0.3 | 30.0 | – | 31.1 | 0.2 |
| Maine | 28.5 | – | 34.9 | – | 34.8 | – |
| Massachusetts | 27.9 | 0.2 | 21.1 | – | 21.2 | 0.2 |
| New Hampshire | 18.5 | – | 35.2 | – | 36.9 | – |
| RhodeIsland | 38.0 | – | S | S | 49.6 | – |
| Vermont | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 22.3 | 0.4 | 49.9 | 0.3 | S | S |
| New York | 22.4 | 0.5 | 19.1 | – | 18.5 | 0.5 |
| Pennsylvania | 12.6 | 0.2 | 17.0 | – | 17.0 | 0.4 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 11.2 | 0.2 | 22.7 | – | 23.9 | 0.4 |
| Indiana | 16.7 | 0.1 | 24.9 | – | 25.9 | 0.4 |
| Michigan | 14.0 | – | 39.5 | 0.1 | 42.1 | 0.6 |
| Ohio | 12.1 | 0.2 | 12.5 | 0.1 | 13.1 | 0.7 |
| Wisconsin | 16.4 | – | 30.8 | – | 31.0 | 0.2 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 17.8 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Kansas | 35.6 | 0.2 | 16.9 | – | 17.8 | 0.1 |
| Minnesota | 16.9 | – | 33.3 | – | 32.7 | 0.5 |
| Missouri | 14.4 | – | 17.5 | – | 19.7 | 0.2 |
| Nebraska | 31.5 | – | 35.2 | – | 35.5 | 0.2 |
| North Dakota | 41.2 | – | S | S | S | S |
| South Dakota | 28.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | 24.7 | – | 48.2 | – | 44.9 | 0.1 |
| District of Columbia | 32.3 | – | 37.2 | – | 35.1 | – |
| Florida | 8.4 | 1.6 | 13.4 | 1.7 | 14.4 | 3.5 |
| Georgia | 16.9 | 0.4 | 13.2 | 0.3 | 10.3 | 0.4 |
| Maryland | 15.9 | 0.1 | 32.3 | – | 31.7 | 0.2 |
| North Carolina | 24.7 | 0.4 | 25.4 | 0.1 | 25.7 | 0.4 |
| South Carolina | 18.6 | 0.1 | 41.9 | 0.4 | S | S |
| Virginia | 30.6 | 0.2 | 21.0 | – | 21.3 | 0.2 |
| West Virginia | 22.5 | – | 37.2 | – | 36.5 | – |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 20.6 | 0.3 | 20.2 | 0.2 | 23.4 | 0.4 |
| Kentucky | 14.6 | – | 26.8 | – | 27.1 | 0.2 |
| Mississippi | 15.8 | – | 26.9 | – | 29.0 | – |
| Tennessee | 14.0 | 0.1 | 16.7 | – | 17.9 | 0.3 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | 29.8 | 0.1 | 49.7 | 0.1 | S | S |
| Louisiana | 9.4 | – | 33.6 | 0.1 | 33.8 | 0.7 |
| Oklahoma | 18.7 | – | 19.2 | – | 20.8 | – |
| Texas | 16.2 | 0.4 | 23.9 | 0.2 | 27.2 | 1.2 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 13.3 | – | 25.4 | – | 25.3 | 0.1 |
| Colorado | 16.3 | – | 31.2 | – | 33.4 | 0.2 |
| Idaho | 28.9 | – | 47.3 | – | 49.7 | – |
| Montana | 27.6 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Nevada | S | S | 42.9 | – | 42.5 | – |
| New Mexico | 34.0 | – | 33.6 | – | 33.2 | – |
| Utah | 16.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Wyoming | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | 29.3 | – | S | S | S | S |
| California | 7.3 | 0.2 | 15.0 | – | 15.3 | 1.0 |
| Hawaii | 42.3 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Oregon | 21.7 | – | 22.8 | – | 23.1 | 0.2 |
| Washington | 17.7 | 0.1 | 30.0 | – | 29.6 | 0.5 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.