Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 9.2 | – | 14.7 | – | S | S |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Maine | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Massachusetts | 45.4 | – | 41.3 | – | 41.0 | – |
| New Hampshire | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| RhodeIsland | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Vermont | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 38.2 | – | 41.3 | – | 41.5 | 1.9 |
| New York | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Pennsylvania | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 44.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Indiana | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Michigan | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Ohio | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Wisconsin | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Kansas | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Minnesota | S | S | 39.3 | – | 39.1 | – |
| Missouri | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Nebraska | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| North Dakota | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| South Dakota | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| District of Columbia | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Florida | 32.9 | – | 42.4 | – | 42.9 | 1.1 |
| Georgia | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Maryland | 45.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| North Carolina | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| South Carolina | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Virginia | 46.1 | – | 35.1 | – | 34.1 | – |
| West Virginia | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Kentucky | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Mississippi | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Tennessee | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Louisiana | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Oklahoma | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Texas | 45.3 | – | S | S | S | S |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 45.0 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Colorado | 45.0 | – | 48.4 | – | 47.3 | – |
| Idaho | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Montana | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Nevada | 48.6 | – | S | S | S | S |
| New Mexico | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Utah | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Wyoming | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| California | 23.1 | 0.6 | S | S | S | S |
| Hawaii | 10.0 | 1.0 | 13.0 | 2.0 | 23.9 | 12.4 |
| Oregon | 32.4 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Washington | 42.3 | 0.2 | S | S | S | S |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.