Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 9.9 | – | 10.6 | – | 13.9 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 35.8 | – | 36.0 | – | 35.8 | 0.1 |
| Maine | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Massachusetts | 19.9 | 0.2 | 32.3 | – | 31.6 | 0.3 |
| New Hampshire | 33.0 | – | 35.6 | – | 35.7 | – |
| RhodeIsland | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Vermont | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 37.6 | 0.1 | 23.2 | – | 23.8 | 0.5 |
| New York | 39.2 | 0.6 | 40.6 | 0.6 | 40.8 | 1.5 |
| Pennsylvania | 35.2 | 0.8 | 38.5 | 0.4 | 38.0 | 1.2 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 14.0 | 0.3 | 22.4 | 0.5 | 22.2 | 1.0 |
| Indiana | 21.1 | 0.2 | 27.4 | 0.2 | 26.8 | 0.6 |
| Michigan | 27.5 | 0.3 | 27.3 | 0.1 | 27.9 | 0.4 |
| Ohio | 19.1 | 0.2 | 30.7 | 0.4 | 31.1 | 0.8 |
| Wisconsin | 16.9 | 0.3 | 14.7 | 0.1 | 15.5 | 0.5 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 18.3 | 0.1 | 34.8 | 0.2 | 34.5 | 0.5 |
| Kansas | 16.2 | – | 27.6 | 0.1 | 27.8 | 0.2 |
| Minnesota | 20.3 | 0.3 | 22.4 | 0.1 | 23.9 | 0.3 |
| Missouri | 35.8 | 0.7 | 27.0 | 0.2 | 28.3 | 0.7 |
| Nebraska | 22.4 | – | 30.6 | 0.1 | 33.9 | 0.2 |
| North Dakota | 42.5 | 0.1 | S | S | S | S |
| South Dakota | 45.0 | – | S | S | S | S |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| District of Columbia | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Florida | 27.7 | 0.5 | 32.8 | 0.4 | 33.4 | 1.4 |
| Georgia | 33.7 | 0.4 | 39.2 | 0.6 | 39.5 | 1.1 |
| Maryland | 39.9 | 0.3 | 37.4 | – | 36.9 | 0.2 |
| North Carolina | S | S | 34.8 | – | 35.0 | 0.3 |
| South Carolina | 45.2 | 0.1 | 29.5 | – | 30.2 | 0.2 |
| Virginia | 49.5 | 0.7 | 38.9 | – | 40.6 | 0.3 |
| West Virginia | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 40.0 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Kentucky | S | S | 34.9 | 0.2 | 36.5 | 1.7 |
| Mississippi | 24.3 | – | 40.7 | – | 40.2 | 0.2 |
| Tennessee | S | S | 38.6 | 0.3 | 38.0 | 0.7 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | 23.1 | – | 46.2 | – | 45.7 | 0.1 |
| Louisiana | 29.1 | 0.1 | 27.8 | – | 30.7 | 0.4 |
| Oklahoma | 47.2 | 0.2 | 29.2 | – | 30.1 | 0.2 |
| Texas | 32.6 | 0.9 | 28.2 | 0.8 | 28.7 | 1.2 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 31.0 | 0.4 | 20.1 | 0.2 | 23.2 | 0.5 |
| Colorado | 36.0 | 0.7 | 40.3 | 0.8 | 37.7 | 1.1 |
| Idaho | 13.2 | 2.1 | 17.5 | 4.9 | 17.6 | 1.1 |
| Montana | 12.3 | 0.2 | 22.7 | 0.5 | 17.0 | 0.2 |
| Nevada | 19.3 | 0.5 | 49.8 | 1.7 | 34.8 | 1.5 |
| New Mexico | 24.1 | – | 33.8 | – | 34.1 | – |
| Utah | 9.4 | 0.7 | 21.4 | 0.8 | 18.6 | 0.5 |
| Wyoming | 28.8 | 0.4 | 33.8 | 0.4 | S | S |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | S | S | S | S | 50.0 | – |
| California | 34.6 | 3.9 | 14.6 | 0.9 | 15.5 | 1.1 |
| Hawaii | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Oregon | 19.3 | 0.7 | 36.1 | 2.4 | 38.7 | 1.6 |
| Washington | 26.5 | 1.0 | 18.9 | 1.0 | 19.6 | 0.9 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.