Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 3.4 | – | 10.5 | – | 3.1 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 37.9 | 0.1 | 26.7 | – | 27.5 | – |
| Maine | 26.0 | – | 34.1 | – | 36.2 | – |
| Massachusetts | 29.3 | 0.2 | 19.3 | – | 18.6 | 0.1 |
| New Hampshire | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| RhodeIsland | 30.2 | – | 30.7 | – | 30.2 | – |
| Vermont | 33.7 | – | S | S | S | S |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 28.3 | 0.6 | 19.9 | 0.1 | 19.1 | 0.2 |
| New York | 15.9 | 0.3 | 24.3 | – | 25.5 | 0.3 |
| Pennsylvania | 19.5 | 0.5 | 15.5 | 0.2 | 14.0 | 0.4 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 8.2 | 2.2 | 17.4 | 4.4 | 10.6 | 1.1 |
| Indiana | 10.9 | 0.6 | 39.2 | 2.6 | 23.9 | 0.9 |
| Michigan | 8.0 | 0.3 | 17.0 | 0.4 | 12.4 | 0.3 |
| Ohio | 13.7 | 0.6 | 17.5 | 0.4 | 19.5 | 0.6 |
| Wisconsin | 10.7 | 0.5 | 21.9 | 0.8 | 24.1 | 0.5 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 10.8 | 0.1 | 25.4 | 0.3 | 13.0 | 0.1 |
| Kansas | 13.2 | – | 35.9 | 0.1 | 36.9 | 0.2 |
| Minnesota | 11.6 | 0.2 | 15.1 | – | 16.1 | 0.2 |
| Missouri | 7.6 | 0.3 | 11.0 | 0.4 | 11.8 | 0.2 |
| Nebraska | 25.8 | 0.1 | 33.4 | – | 33.3 | 0.2 |
| North Dakota | 27.7 | 0.1 | S | S | S | S |
| South Dakota | 17.7 | – | S | S | S | S |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | 33.0 | – | 43.3 | – | 45.3 | – |
| District of Columbia | 34.6 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Florida | 12.7 | 0.2 | 28.4 | 0.2 | 32.7 | 0.8 |
| Georgia | 22.0 | 0.4 | 12.6 | 0.1 | 11.9 | 0.2 |
| Maryland | 15.4 | 0.1 | 39.4 | – | 38.3 | 0.2 |
| North Carolina | 14.7 | 0.2 | 17.9 | – | 18.2 | 0.2 |
| South Carolina | 12.0 | – | 27.3 | – | 27.8 | 0.3 |
| Virginia | 11.1 | – | 19.6 | – | 18.1 | 0.1 |
| West Virginia | 37.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 12.7 | 0.1 | 14.0 | – | 14.0 | 0.1 |
| Kentucky | 13.4 | 0.3 | 39.4 | 1.7 | 42.6 | 1.2 |
| Mississippi | 35.4 | 0.3 | S | S | S | S |
| Tennessee | 12.6 | 0.2 | 23.5 | 0.2 | 34.8 | 0.4 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | 13.0 | – | 11.4 | – | 10.9 | – |
| Louisiana | 7.7 | 0.1 | 7.1 | 1.0 | 7.1 | 2.6 |
| Oklahoma | 21.2 | – | 15.3 | – | 14.9 | – |
| Texas | 8.1 | 0.3 | 16.3 | 0.2 | 22.2 | 1.2 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 10.8 | – | 31.2 | – | 32.3 | 0.3 |
| Colorado | 17.6 | 0.1 | 14.8 | – | 14.5 | – |
| Idaho | 18.3 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Montana | 22.1 | – | 37.9 | – | 36.0 | – |
| Nevada | 43.4 | 0.1 | 33.6 | – | 32.1 | – |
| New Mexico | 15.7 | – | 26.3 | – | 26.0 | – |
| Utah | 19.6 | – | 43.2 | – | 42.2 | 0.1 |
| Wyoming | 29.5 | – | 44.8 | – | 46.0 | – |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | 46.7 | – | S | S | 41.6 | – |
| California | 10.6 | 0.4 | 12.7 | 0.1 | 12.7 | 1.0 |
| Hawaii | 31.6 | – | 39.6 | – | S | S |
| Oregon | 26.1 | 0.1 | 48.1 | – | 49.1 | 0.6 |
| Washington | 11.9 | – | 20.3 | – | 20.4 | 0.1 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.