Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 4.9 | – | 11.9 | – | 8.6 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 18.8 | – | 24.0 | – | 22.3 | – |
| Maine | 39.6 | – | 33.9 | – | 34.6 | – |
| Massachusetts | 30.1 | 0.2 | 21.4 | – | 20.5 | 0.1 |
| New Hampshire | 42.0 | – | 34.4 | – | 33.8 | – |
| RhodeIsland | 45.4 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Vermont | 38.5 | – | S | S | S | S |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 26.6 | 0.3 | 24.3 | 0.1 | 24.3 | 0.2 |
| New York | 20.9 | 0.3 | 22.6 | 0.2 | 23.0 | 0.7 |
| Pennsylvania | 15.0 | 0.3 | 14.9 | 0.2 | 15.5 | 0.2 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 9.5 | 0.7 | 14.1 | 1.0 | 21.5 | 0.5 |
| Indiana | 7.6 | 2.4 | 19.9 | 4.6 | 13.4 | 1.9 |
| Michigan | 8.2 | 0.6 | 6.9 | 0.4 | 9.6 | 0.7 |
| Ohio | 11.3 | 0.7 | 5.2 | 0.4 | 6.0 | 0.4 |
| Wisconsin | 13.7 | 0.2 | 37.4 | 0.5 | 35.6 | 0.4 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 23.3 | 0.3 | 24.8 | 0.2 | 23.2 | 0.3 |
| Kansas | 41.5 | 0.4 | 44.0 | 0.2 | 45.3 | 0.4 |
| Minnesota | 13.9 | 0.2 | 27.8 | 0.2 | 25.6 | 0.2 |
| Missouri | 26.4 | 0.7 | 20.5 | 0.2 | 20.6 | 0.3 |
| Nebraska | 39.3 | 0.3 | 45.2 | 0.1 | 48.0 | 0.5 |
| North Dakota | 40.9 | 0.1 | S | S | S | S |
| South Dakota | S | S | 40.5 | – | 38.1 | – |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | S | S | 43.0 | – | 44.8 | – |
| District of Columbia | 34.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Florida | 16.1 | 0.4 | 37.8 | 0.3 | 44.6 | 1.8 |
| Georgia | 15.1 | 0.3 | S | S | S | S |
| Maryland | 26.9 | 0.2 | 45.0 | 0.3 | 49.3 | 0.8 |
| North Carolina | 13.9 | 0.1 | 15.1 | 0.2 | 17.6 | 0.6 |
| South Carolina | 13.1 | 0.1 | S | S | S | S |
| Virginia | 17.4 | 0.2 | 33.1 | 0.1 | 32.3 | 0.2 |
| West Virginia | 21.4 | – | 28.3 | 0.2 | 30.5 | 0.2 |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 13.7 | 0.1 | 33.8 | 0.4 | 42.3 | 1.3 |
| Kentucky | 18.8 | 1.3 | 16.5 | 0.6 | 12.8 | 0.3 |
| Mississippi | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Tennessee | 14.6 | 0.3 | 11.8 | 0.3 | 16.2 | 0.7 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | 19.2 | 0.1 | 33.5 | 0.2 | 33.7 | 0.3 |
| Louisiana | 18.1 | – | 12.7 | 0.2 | 14.1 | 0.8 |
| Oklahoma | 48.2 | 0.3 | S | S | S | S |
| Texas | 18.7 | 0.8 | 17.9 | 0.2 | 16.7 | 1.6 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 46.8 | 0.2 | 31.2 | – | 31.8 | 0.2 |
| Colorado | 19.3 | 0.1 | 28.5 | – | 29.5 | 0.2 |
| Idaho | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Montana | S | S | 45.1 | – | 43.3 | – |
| Nevada | 23.2 | – | 34.9 | – | 36.4 | – |
| New Mexico | 40.5 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Utah | 46.3 | 0.1 | 38.4 | – | 38.5 | – |
| Wyoming | S | S | 39.5 | – | 41.1 | – |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | 40.3 | – | 43.7 | – | 41.8 | – |
| California | 18.9 | 0.6 | 23.4 | 0.3 | 22.8 | 2.2 |
| Hawaii | 31.9 | – | 42.4 | – | 43.2 | – |
| Oregon | 25.5 | 0.1 | 30.3 | – | 30.5 | 0.5 |
| Washington | 17.9 | – | 31.7 | – | 30.8 | 0.4 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.