Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 5.9 | – | 13.6 | – | 39.2 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 42.2 | 0.3 | 31.3 | – | 39.1 | – |
| Maine | 24.9 | – | 34.4 | – | 37.4 | – |
| Massachusetts | 15.2 | 0.1 | 22.7 | – | 23.8 | 0.1 |
| New Hampshire | 37.3 | – | S | S | S | S |
| RhodeIsland | 33.2 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Vermont | 22.1 | – | S | S | S | S |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 19.4 | 0.2 | 19.5 | – | 19.5 | 0.3 |
| New York | 27.2 | 0.3 | 12.3 | – | 12.1 | 0.2 |
| Pennsylvania | 16.6 | 0.3 | 17.0 | 0.2 | 17.0 | 0.6 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 11.6 | 0.8 | 18.8 | 1.1 | 21.9 | 1.2 |
| Indiana | 8.4 | 0.2 | 12.4 | 0.1 | 13.7 | 0.2 |
| Michigan | 15.9 | 0.4 | 17.3 | 0.2 | 17.3 | 0.4 |
| Ohio | 11.7 | 0.3 | S | S | S | S |
| Wisconsin | 12.9 | 0.4 | 26.2 | 0.5 | 22.6 | 0.5 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 9.7 | 2.0 | 16.5 | 5.0 | 20.0 | 1.4 |
| Kansas | 18.8 | 0.3 | 22.7 | 0.2 | 22.5 | 0.2 |
| Minnesota | 17.7 | 0.7 | 27.2 | 1.1 | 22.7 | 0.5 |
| Missouri | 10.5 | 0.3 | 14.5 | 0.2 | 16.7 | 0.3 |
| Nebraska | 15.8 | 0.5 | 31.1 | 1.1 | 27.7 | 0.3 |
| North Dakota | 25.8 | 0.3 | 23.0 | – | 26.7 | 0.2 |
| South Dakota | 16.9 | 0.1 | 47.2 | 0.2 | 43.0 | – |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | 23.4 | – | 35.2 | – | 33.6 | – |
| District of Columbia | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Florida | 20.0 | 0.3 | 21.8 | – | 22.9 | 0.3 |
| Georgia | 17.3 | 0.3 | 21.9 | – | 24.1 | 0.4 |
| Maryland | 35.1 | 0.7 | 25.2 | 0.1 | 24.9 | 0.4 |
| North Carolina | 24.3 | 0.3 | 14.7 | – | 14.8 | 0.2 |
| South Carolina | 26.2 | 0.2 | 43.2 | – | 48.5 | 0.4 |
| Virginia | 17.9 | 0.1 | 19.5 | – | 20.8 | 0.1 |
| West Virginia | 24.6 | – | 49.5 | – | 49.3 | – |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 25.9 | 0.2 | 36.7 | 0.3 | 38.0 | 0.9 |
| Kentucky | 18.7 | 0.1 | 26.1 | – | 28.3 | 0.2 |
| Mississippi | 21.8 | 0.2 | 36.1 | 0.1 | 41.4 | 0.4 |
| Tennessee | 17.2 | 0.3 | 16.4 | 0.1 | 16.1 | 0.3 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | 26.5 | 0.2 | 21.1 | 0.1 | 19.8 | 0.3 |
| Louisiana | 23.2 | 0.6 | 16.0 | 1.8 | 15.8 | 5.4 |
| Oklahoma | 24.1 | 0.3 | 15.9 | 0.1 | 17.1 | 0.3 |
| Texas | 13.5 | 0.5 | 17.2 | 0.3 | 17.8 | 1.3 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 14.8 | 0.1 | 34.0 | 0.3 | 35.1 | 2.2 |
| Colorado | 13.7 | 0.1 | 21.0 | – | 24.4 | 0.1 |
| Idaho | 33.3 | 0.1 | 40.3 | – | 39.4 | – |
| Montana | 25.1 | 0.1 | 32.6 | – | 30.2 | – |
| Nevada | 32.7 | – | S | S | S | S |
| New Mexico | 15.8 | – | 43.4 | – | 43.1 | 0.3 |
| Utah | 21.2 | – | 29.5 | – | 32.2 | – |
| Wyoming | S | S | 45.8 | – | 46.1 | – |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| California | 29.7 | 1.3 | S | S | S | S |
| Hawaii | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Oregon | 15.7 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Washington | 31.8 | 0.3 | 29.0 | – | 29.8 | 0.3 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.