Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 16.2 | – | 9.4 | – | 14.7 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 30.3 | 0.1 | S | S | S | S |
| Maine | 31.4 | – | 47.6 | – | 43.9 | – |
| Massachusetts | S | S | 35.0 | – | 32.3 | 0.2 |
| New Hampshire | S | S | 37.0 | – | 35.1 | – |
| RhodeIsland | S | S | 36.2 | – | 35.9 | – |
| Vermont | 48.6 | – | 35.8 | – | 35.9 | – |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 32.5 | 0.4 | 30.8 | 0.2 | 30.0 | 0.9 |
| New York | 48.6 | 1.0 | S | S | S | S |
| Pennsylvania | 29.4 | 0.4 | 28.6 | 0.3 | 29.2 | 0.6 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 18.0 | 0.4 | 30.8 | 0.9 | 15.9 | 0.5 |
| Indiana | 13.0 | 0.3 | 16.8 | 0.3 | 33.5 | 0.5 |
| Michigan | 25.4 | 1.1 | 38.9 | 1.0 | 37.3 | 1.2 |
| Ohio | 20.9 | 1.6 | 35.0 | 3.2 | 41.7 | 2.0 |
| Wisconsin | 19.1 | 0.2 | S | S | S | S |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 18.4 | – | 12.4 | – | 11.5 | – |
| Kansas | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Minnesota | 28.5 | 0.2 | 41.2 | 0.1 | 44.3 | 0.4 |
| Missouri | 33.8 | 0.5 | 35.6 | 0.3 | 39.7 | 0.4 |
| Nebraska | 31.7 | – | 36.2 | – | 34.1 | – |
| North Dakota | 27.9 | – | 37.4 | – | 36.4 | – |
| South Dakota | 38.4 | – | S | S | S | S |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | 22.6 | – | 32.5 | – | 32.2 | – |
| District of Columbia | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Florida | 21.0 | 0.5 | 32.1 | 1.0 | 32.6 | 2.7 |
| Georgia | 32.4 | 0.5 | 30.2 | 1.7 | 27.2 | 1.7 |
| Maryland | 17.0 | 0.1 | S | S | S | S |
| North Carolina | 14.6 | 0.2 | 24.2 | 1.1 | 24.4 | 1.2 |
| South Carolina | 33.0 | 0.4 | 35.8 | 1.2 | 35.1 | 1.8 |
| Virginia | 31.2 | 0.3 | 36.6 | 0.5 | 37.0 | 0.7 |
| West Virginia | 24.3 | 0.3 | 33.1 | 0.6 | 27.8 | 0.6 |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 19.7 | 0.3 | S | S | S | S |
| Kentucky | 13.1 | 3.1 | 20.2 | 6.2 | 12.4 | 1.9 |
| Mississippi | 26.9 | 0.2 | 27.8 | – | 24.2 | – |
| Tennessee | 15.0 | 0.6 | 39.2 | 1.4 | 36.4 | 0.8 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | S | S | S | S | 43.7 | 0.5 |
| Louisiana | 29.1 | 0.2 | 31.3 | 0.6 | 33.5 | 1.6 |
| Oklahoma | 38.3 | 0.3 | 25.0 | – | 25.8 | 0.1 |
| Texas | 35.9 | 0.6 | 28.4 | 0.5 | 28.5 | 1.7 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 13.2 | – | 25.1 | – | 23.9 | – |
| Colorado | 22.8 | 0.1 | 24.5 | – | 24.6 | – |
| Idaho | 46.2 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Montana | 32.6 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Nevada | 42.3 | – | 20.9 | – | 21.2 | – |
| New Mexico | 34.9 | – | 38.1 | – | 37.8 | – |
| Utah | 43.0 | – | 28.2 | – | 28.2 | 0.1 |
| Wyoming | S | S | 42.1 | – | 41.7 | – |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| California | 30.0 | 0.6 | 24.0 | 0.1 | 27.3 | 0.9 |
| Hawaii | 41.1 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Oregon | 28.7 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Washington | 31.7 | 0.1 | 22.3 | – | 21.9 | 0.2 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.