Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 3.9 | – | 6.5 | – | 17.8 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 30.6 | – | 42.4 | – | 41.8 | – |
| Maine | 39.1 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Massachusetts | 18.5 | – | 25.4 | – | 24.8 | – |
| New Hampshire | 33.4 | – | 48.2 | – | 49.0 | – |
| RhodeIsland | S | S | 48.2 | – | 48.7 | – |
| Vermont | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 24.9 | 0.3 | S | S | S | S |
| New York | 19.0 | 0.2 | 43.1 | – | S | S |
| Pennsylvania | 17.1 | 0.1 | 17.5 | – | 19.7 | 0.3 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 22.2 | 0.6 | 27.4 | 0.5 | 24.8 | 2.1 |
| Indiana | 24.1 | 0.1 | 26.4 | – | 24.9 | 0.1 |
| Michigan | 36.1 | 0.5 | 23.7 | – | 22.3 | 0.3 |
| Ohio | 20.5 | 0.3 | 37.2 | 0.4 | 44.3 | 2.5 |
| Wisconsin | 24.0 | 0.1 | 39.4 | 0.1 | 40.8 | 0.6 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 36.4 | 0.3 | 30.3 | – | 32.3 | 0.4 |
| Kansas | 24.3 | – | 24.0 | – | 25.5 | 0.1 |
| Minnesota | 39.9 | 0.2 | 47.6 | – | S | S |
| Missouri | 20.5 | 0.3 | 23.8 | 0.1 | 27.4 | 0.5 |
| Nebraska | 19.6 | – | 46.1 | – | 41.8 | 0.2 |
| North Dakota | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| South Dakota | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | 46.9 | – | 40.6 | – | 40.5 | – |
| District of Columbia | 29.2 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Florida | 22.0 | 1.0 | 31.1 | 1.3 | 31.9 | 4.0 |
| Georgia | 14.7 | 0.2 | 11.8 | – | 10.5 | 0.3 |
| Maryland | 20.1 | – | S | S | S | S |
| North Carolina | 8.2 | – | 14.9 | – | 14.2 | 0.1 |
| South Carolina | 15.0 | – | 15.1 | – | 15.8 | 0.1 |
| Virginia | 25.0 | 0.1 | S | S | S | S |
| West Virginia | 21.0 | – | 36.0 | – | 39.3 | 0.3 |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 35.7 | 0.8 | 23.0 | 0.2 | 28.4 | 0.5 |
| Kentucky | 26.7 | 0.4 | 33.0 | 0.6 | 31.3 | 1.9 |
| Mississippi | 17.3 | 0.6 | 25.4 | 0.9 | 19.5 | 0.4 |
| Tennessee | 16.7 | 0.2 | 37.2 | 0.3 | 41.7 | 1.0 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | 19.1 | 0.2 | 23.4 | 0.2 | 22.6 | 0.4 |
| Louisiana | 4.4 | 1.8 | 8.7 | 3.0 | 13.2 | 1.8 |
| Oklahoma | 14.1 | – | 29.7 | 0.1 | 39.1 | 0.4 |
| Texas | 5.2 | 0.6 | 12.3 | 1.1 | 14.0 | 1.7 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 22.3 | – | 16.6 | – | 15.5 | 0.2 |
| Colorado | 20.9 | – | 13.6 | – | 14.2 | – |
| Idaho | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Montana | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Nevada | 34.3 | – | 38.2 | – | 39.7 | – |
| New Mexico | 34.8 | – | 31.8 | – | 30.7 | – |
| Utah | 46.3 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Wyoming | 48.4 | – | 48.5 | – | 48.6 | – |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| California | 13.3 | 0.3 | 11.7 | – | 23.2 | 1.8 |
| Hawaii | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Oregon | 25.1 | – | 24.1 | – | 24.0 | 0.1 |
| Washington | 29.8 | 0.1 | S | S | S | S |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.