Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 18.9 | – | 11.5 | – | 28.1 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 15.4 | 1.0 | 9.1 | 0.8 | 7.6 | 0.3 |
| Maine | 11.9 | 0.1 | 12.6 | 0.2 | 17.9 | 0.3 |
| Massachusetts | 9.0 | 3.7 | 16.3 | 3.8 | 11.2 | 2.4 |
| New Hampshire | 12.7 | 0.4 | 27.0 | 1.4 | 24.0 | 0.5 |
| RhodeIsland | 14.3 | 0.4 | 23.2 | 0.8 | 18.0 | 0.2 |
| Vermont | 43.4 | 1.0 | 26.5 | 0.2 | 23.4 | 0.2 |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 22.7 | 0.7 | 24.4 | 0.7 | 21.7 | 0.7 |
| New York | 16.8 | 1.2 | 15.4 | 0.8 | 14.0 | 0.9 |
| Pennsylvania | 19.7 | 0.7 | 17.1 | 0.4 | 17.3 | 0.8 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 21.7 | 0.6 | 24.6 | 0.2 | 25.2 | 1.1 |
| Indiana | 24.9 | 0.2 | S | S | S | S |
| Michigan | 20.2 | 0.3 | 20.0 | 0.1 | 20.5 | 0.5 |
| Ohio | 23.8 | 0.5 | 32.4 | 0.3 | 31.5 | 1.0 |
| Wisconsin | 28.4 | 0.3 | 21.8 | – | 21.9 | 0.4 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 28.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Kansas | 34.5 | 0.1 | 48.2 | – | 49.0 | 0.2 |
| Minnesota | 23.5 | 0.2 | 18.6 | – | 18.8 | 0.5 |
| Missouri | 32.9 | 0.3 | 24.5 | – | 24.0 | 0.5 |
| Nebraska | S | S | 43.2 | – | 46.1 | – |
| North Dakota | 24.0 | – | S | S | S | S |
| South Dakota | 25.3 | – | 47.8 | – | 46.0 | – |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | 31.8 | – | 48.6 | – | 49.8 | – |
| District of Columbia | S | S | 42.3 | – | 41.1 | – |
| Florida | 20.3 | 0.5 | S | S | S | S |
| Georgia | S | S | 29.0 | 0.1 | 28.5 | 0.7 |
| Maryland | 19.4 | 0.2 | 20.1 | 0.1 | 18.5 | 0.3 |
| North Carolina | 31.7 | 0.3 | 27.9 | 0.1 | 33.5 | 0.3 |
| South Carolina | 19.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Virginia | 33.4 | 0.2 | 20.8 | – | 21.3 | 0.2 |
| West Virginia | 32.5 | – | 41.2 | – | 42.9 | 0.1 |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | S | S | 40.2 | – | 39.2 | 1.0 |
| Kentucky | 16.6 | – | 39.7 | – | 39.8 | 0.1 |
| Mississippi | 26.0 | – | 28.0 | – | 27.0 | 0.2 |
| Tennessee | 15.8 | 0.2 | 24.3 | – | 24.9 | 0.5 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | S | S | 36.3 | – | 37.0 | 0.2 |
| Louisiana | 22.6 | – | 39.3 | – | 39.4 | 0.2 |
| Oklahoma | 31.7 | – | 22.2 | – | 22.4 | – |
| Texas | S | S | 38.0 | 0.3 | 40.7 | 1.5 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 37.2 | 0.2 | S | S | S | S |
| Colorado | 23.2 | – | 15.9 | – | 15.5 | 0.1 |
| Idaho | 36.4 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Montana | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Nevada | 21.4 | – | 21.7 | – | 21.8 | 0.3 |
| New Mexico | S | S | 32.9 | – | 33.4 | – |
| Utah | 29.7 | – | 47.4 | – | 47.0 | – |
| Wyoming | S | S | 40.9 | – | 41.0 | – |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| California | 10.2 | 0.5 | 21.3 | 0.1 | 21.6 | 1.1 |
| Hawaii | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Oregon | 33.5 | – | 27.4 | – | 27.6 | 0.2 |
| Washington | S | S | 41.4 | – | 41.4 | 0.7 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.