Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 5.4 | – | 7.8 | – | 9.4 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 17.1 | – | 35.2 | – | 37.1 | 0.1 |
| Maine | 21.0 | – | 45.4 | – | 47.0 | – |
| Massachusetts | 26.8 | 0.2 | 18.9 | – | 16.9 | – |
| New Hampshire | S | S | 34.8 | – | 32.6 | – |
| RhodeIsland | 48.1 | – | 43.1 | – | 42.6 | – |
| Vermont | 26.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 15.4 | 0.2 | 10.1 | – | 10.8 | 0.1 |
| New York | 17.0 | 0.4 | 20.6 | 0.2 | 14.4 | 0.4 |
| Pennsylvania | 16.3 | 0.3 | 18.9 | 0.2 | 18.2 | 0.6 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 12.4 | 0.5 | 8.9 | 0.4 | 11.7 | 1.1 |
| Indiana | 12.8 | 0.5 | 17.0 | 0.6 | 15.7 | 0.5 |
| Michigan | 9.5 | 3.1 | 9.5 | 1.8 | 16.3 | 2.6 |
| Ohio | 5.3 | 0.4 | 10.8 | 1.2 | 18.5 | 1.6 |
| Wisconsin | 14.3 | 0.2 | 25.1 | 0.5 | 33.7 | 1.3 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 19.5 | 0.1 | 16.0 | – | 15.3 | 0.1 |
| Kansas | 25.4 | 0.2 | 20.4 | – | 19.2 | – |
| Minnesota | 24.7 | 0.3 | 42.6 | 0.4 | 40.8 | 0.8 |
| Missouri | 18.4 | 0.6 | 12.3 | 0.1 | 12.8 | 0.4 |
| Nebraska | 23.8 | – | 22.1 | – | 20.5 | – |
| North Dakota | 47.1 | – | 25.7 | – | 27.3 | – |
| South Dakota | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | 27.8 | – | 48.8 | – | 48.6 | 0.2 |
| District of Columbia | 43.8 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Florida | 12.6 | 0.2 | 10.9 | – | 10.6 | 0.1 |
| Georgia | 14.5 | 0.2 | 20.9 | – | 21.5 | 0.3 |
| Maryland | 23.2 | 0.1 | S | S | S | S |
| North Carolina | 14.6 | 0.1 | 36.1 | 0.1 | 37.4 | 0.4 |
| South Carolina | 37.1 | 0.2 | 27.0 | – | 26.1 | 0.1 |
| Virginia | 18.7 | 0.2 | 30.3 | – | 28.8 | 0.3 |
| West Virginia | 26.6 | – | S | S | 48.5 | 0.1 |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 27.8 | 0.2 | 34.0 | – | 31.3 | 0.2 |
| Kentucky | 12.0 | 0.2 | 39.2 | 0.3 | 47.4 | 0.8 |
| Mississippi | 30.0 | 0.1 | 16.7 | – | 18.1 | – |
| Tennessee | 15.3 | 0.2 | 43.1 | 0.3 | 44.6 | 1.2 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | 20.5 | – | 43.4 | 0.1 | 47.8 | 0.4 |
| Louisiana | 24.2 | 0.1 | 15.1 | – | 14.5 | – |
| Oklahoma | 21.1 | – | 22.2 | – | 22.0 | 0.1 |
| Texas | 15.1 | 0.5 | 17.8 | 0.2 | 20.1 | 1.6 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 21.6 | 0.1 | 16.6 | – | 16.8 | 0.1 |
| Colorado | 34.0 | 0.2 | 41.6 | – | 41.0 | 0.3 |
| Idaho | 27.9 | – | 32.1 | – | 32.7 | – |
| Montana | 39.9 | – | 36.4 | – | 35.9 | – |
| Nevada | 30.8 | – | 47.5 | – | 46.0 | 0.4 |
| New Mexico | 31.4 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Utah | 40.9 | – | 30.1 | – | 30.2 | 0.1 |
| Wyoming | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| California | 12.5 | 0.3 | 13.1 | – | 13.4 | 0.8 |
| Hawaii | 44.4 | – | 42.9 | – | 47.6 | – |
| Oregon | 23.1 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Washington | 16.3 | – | 15.1 | – | 15.0 | 0.3 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.