Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 13.6 | – | 8.2 | – | 12.8 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 16.1 | 0.3 | 19.7 | 0.4 | 24.2 | 0.4 |
| Maine | 41.6 | 0.1 | 30.7 | – | 31.7 | 0.2 |
| Massachusetts | 18.0 | 0.6 | 29.3 | 0.3 | 30.6 | 0.7 |
| New Hampshire | 28.5 | 0.1 | 21.5 | – | 22.3 | 0.1 |
| RhodeIsland | 43.6 | 0.2 | S | S | S | S |
| Vermont | 39.0 | 0.1 | 38.7 | – | 37.8 | – |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 10.0 | 1.4 | 12.4 | 3.8 | 12.6 | 1.6 |
| New York | 9.5 | 1.4 | 14.9 | 1.4 | 20.1 | 2.0 |
| Pennsylvania | 6.8 | 0.6 | 22.1 | 1.7 | 13.8 | 0.6 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 13.1 | 0.4 | 28.5 | 0.2 | 29.0 | 0.8 |
| Indiana | 23.6 | 0.3 | 16.0 | – | 16.7 | 0.1 |
| Michigan | 24.8 | 0.4 | 24.1 | – | 23.7 | 0.7 |
| Ohio | 14.7 | 0.5 | 18.8 | 0.3 | 20.6 | 0.7 |
| Wisconsin | 25.7 | 0.3 | 37.4 | 0.2 | 39.4 | 0.6 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 48.5 | 0.3 | S | S | S | S |
| Kansas | S | S | 24.5 | – | 24.9 | – |
| Minnesota | 24.4 | 0.1 | 37.9 | – | 36.9 | 0.5 |
| Missouri | 18.6 | 0.1 | 23.9 | – | 24.7 | 0.4 |
| Nebraska | 18.8 | – | 41.1 | – | 40.8 | – |
| North Dakota | 40.5 | – | 34.7 | – | 33.8 | – |
| South Dakota | 41.0 | – | 37.0 | – | 36.5 | – |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | 29.5 | 0.2 | 32.7 | 0.5 | 34.5 | 0.2 |
| District of Columbia | 37.7 | – | S | S | 48.3 | – |
| Florida | 21.3 | 0.8 | 25.8 | 0.3 | 24.8 | 1.1 |
| Georgia | S | S | 18.4 | 0.2 | 17.5 | 0.3 |
| Maryland | 17.4 | 0.7 | 21.4 | 0.3 | 26.9 | 0.5 |
| North Carolina | 12.5 | 0.3 | 26.6 | 0.2 | 25.8 | 0.5 |
| South Carolina | 25.2 | 0.2 | S | S | S | S |
| Virginia | 16.8 | 0.4 | 15.0 | 0.1 | 17.1 | 0.3 |
| West Virginia | 17.1 | – | 29.3 | – | 35.5 | 0.1 |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 22.3 | 0.1 | 22.9 | – | 22.1 | – |
| Kentucky | 17.3 | – | 17.6 | – | 18.4 | 0.1 |
| Mississippi | 15.0 | – | 41.6 | – | 42.0 | 0.2 |
| Tennessee | 28.1 | 0.3 | 31.2 | 0.1 | 30.9 | 0.5 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | 24.7 | – | 22.5 | – | 22.4 | – |
| Louisiana | 45.8 | 0.2 | S | S | S | S |
| Oklahoma | 25.2 | – | 37.5 | – | 36.9 | 0.2 |
| Texas | 11.2 | 0.3 | 22.8 | 0.3 | 23.1 | 1.9 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 28.5 | 0.4 | S | S | S | S |
| Colorado | 38.8 | 0.1 | S | S | S | S |
| Idaho | 26.9 | – | 37.0 | – | 38.0 | – |
| Montana | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Nevada | S | S | 46.8 | – | 47.4 | 0.2 |
| New Mexico | 24.1 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Utah | S | S | 44.3 | – | 44.3 | 0.5 |
| Wyoming | 32.3 | – | 44.6 | – | 48.0 | – |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | 40.2 | – | S | S | S | S |
| California | 10.4 | 0.5 | 28.4 | 0.3 | 29.2 | 2.0 |
| Hawaii | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Oregon | 18.3 | – | 45.4 | – | 45.1 | 0.5 |
| Washington | 15.6 | – | 37.9 | – | 38.8 | 0.7 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.