Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 5.1 | – | 11.8 | – | 10.6 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 14.1 | – | 17.8 | – | 17.7 | 0.1 |
| Maine | 22.9 | – | 35.4 | – | 33.4 | – |
| Massachusetts | 15.0 | 0.2 | 8.5 | – | 8.7 | 0.1 |
| New Hampshire | 25.2 | – | 43.3 | – | 44.7 | 0.3 |
| RhodeIsland | 20.9 | – | 20.3 | – | 21.1 | – |
| Vermont | S | S | 49.5 | – | 49.2 | – |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 12.3 | 0.4 | 11.6 | 0.1 | 12.7 | 0.3 |
| New York | 11.3 | 0.2 | 9.5 | 0.1 | 10.1 | 0.3 |
| Pennsylvania | 15.3 | 0.8 | 7.4 | 0.2 | 6.9 | 0.3 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 12.9 | 0.3 | 19.6 | 0.1 | 21.6 | 0.7 |
| Indiana | 33.4 | 0.4 | 15.7 | 0.1 | 12.8 | 0.2 |
| Michigan | 14.1 | 0.3 | 16.7 | 0.1 | 16.9 | 0.4 |
| Ohio | 10.5 | 0.2 | 13.4 | 0.1 | 15.1 | 0.3 |
| Wisconsin | 13.3 | 0.1 | 18.2 | – | 18.1 | 0.2 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 19.6 | 0.1 | 32.7 | – | 30.4 | 0.3 |
| Kansas | 19.3 | – | 28.8 | – | 29.6 | 0.1 |
| Minnesota | 9.0 | – | 21.8 | – | 23.3 | 0.1 |
| Missouri | 15.7 | 0.1 | 23.9 | – | 26.3 | 0.1 |
| Nebraska | 21.8 | – | 37.7 | – | 41.0 | 0.1 |
| North Dakota | 44.5 | – | 48.3 | – | 49.6 | 0.1 |
| South Dakota | 12.3 | – | S | S | S | S |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | 12.9 | – | 24.6 | – | 23.7 | – |
| District of Columbia | 41.5 | – | 34.9 | – | 37.2 | – |
| Florida | 15.6 | 0.7 | 21.0 | 0.6 | 27.1 | 1.9 |
| Georgia | 11.9 | 0.5 | 13.7 | 0.3 | 9.4 | 0.6 |
| Maryland | 19.0 | 0.2 | 11.8 | – | 12.1 | – |
| North Carolina | 9.3 | 3.0 | 14.7 | 2.5 | 26.4 | 2.7 |
| South Carolina | 10.6 | 0.4 | 15.4 | 0.6 | 15.0 | 0.6 |
| Virginia | 9.2 | 0.5 | 9.4 | 0.5 | 8.6 | 0.5 |
| West Virginia | 10.8 | – | 16.9 | – | 19.0 | 0.2 |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 26.5 | 0.3 | 13.6 | – | 16.6 | 0.2 |
| Kentucky | 11.9 | 0.1 | 9.0 | – | 10.6 | 0.1 |
| Mississippi | 18.0 | – | 16.1 | – | 16.2 | 0.1 |
| Tennessee | 12.6 | 0.3 | 14.1 | 0.2 | 13.4 | 0.3 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | 19.9 | – | 27.4 | – | 29.1 | 0.3 |
| Louisiana | 17.8 | – | 29.8 | – | 30.2 | 0.2 |
| Oklahoma | 28.2 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Texas | 10.9 | 0.3 | 15.0 | 0.2 | 14.5 | 0.9 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 38.2 | 0.2 | 48.7 | 0.1 | 47.3 | 0.8 |
| Colorado | 13.8 | – | 18.1 | – | 18.1 | 0.1 |
| Idaho | 16.9 | – | 17.7 | – | 18.1 | – |
| Montana | 34.1 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Nevada | 26.5 | – | 22.6 | – | 22.4 | – |
| New Mexico | 30.5 | – | 38.9 | – | 38.7 | – |
| Utah | 15.9 | – | 26.7 | – | 27.7 | – |
| Wyoming | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | 43.3 | – | S | S | S | S |
| California | 16.7 | 0.4 | 24.5 | 0.2 | 24.1 | 1.6 |
| Hawaii | 29.9 | – | 26.1 | – | 26.5 | – |
| Oregon | 13.4 | – | 29.5 | – | 29.7 | 0.3 |
| Washington | 20.1 | 0.1 | 29.3 | – | 29.1 | 0.4 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.