Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 8.9 | – | 9.6 | – | 18.0 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 19.2 | 0.1 | 21.0 | – | 20.9 | – |
| Maine | 24.3 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Massachusetts | 17.8 | 0.1 | 30.4 | 0.1 | 28.6 | 0.3 |
| New Hampshire | 20.9 | – | 20.1 | – | 20.6 | – |
| RhodeIsland | S | S | 40.0 | – | 41.9 | – |
| Vermont | 33.6 | – | 30.6 | – | 28.7 | – |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 17.3 | 0.4 | 23.5 | 0.2 | 22.6 | 0.4 |
| New York | 8.7 | 0.4 | 10.7 | 0.2 | 14.0 | 0.4 |
| Pennsylvania | 12.4 | 0.4 | 34.7 | 0.9 | 47.4 | 1.3 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 6.6 | 0.3 | 9.2 | 0.1 | 8.2 | 0.2 |
| Indiana | 17.7 | 0.5 | 16.9 | 0.7 | 16.6 | 0.3 |
| Michigan | 17.2 | 0.9 | 8.8 | 0.5 | 13.8 | 1.4 |
| Ohio | 8.2 | 1.8 | 6.6 | 2.9 | 13.0 | 1.8 |
| Wisconsin | 47.5 | 0.9 | 32.2 | 0.3 | 30.4 | 0.6 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 15.5 | – | 32.2 | – | 34.0 | 0.3 |
| Kansas | 31.9 | 0.2 | 28.0 | – | 27.6 | 0.2 |
| Minnesota | 30.1 | 0.3 | 16.8 | – | 17.2 | 0.2 |
| Missouri | 14.8 | 0.2 | 13.3 | – | 13.8 | 0.2 |
| Nebraska | 18.3 | – | 20.6 | – | 20.2 | – |
| North Dakota | 39.3 | – | 41.7 | – | 41.9 | – |
| South Dakota | 25.5 | – | 30.7 | – | 30.8 | – |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | 48.3 | 0.1 | S | S | S | S |
| District of Columbia | 17.7 | – | 29.0 | – | 26.4 | – |
| Florida | 12.5 | 0.2 | 27.0 | 0.2 | 33.0 | 1.1 |
| Georgia | 13.2 | 0.3 | 23.0 | 0.3 | 21.3 | 0.7 |
| Maryland | 19.2 | 0.2 | 22.2 | 0.1 | 21.2 | 0.2 |
| North Carolina | 24.5 | 0.4 | 49.0 | 0.7 | S | S |
| South Carolina | S | S | 34.1 | 0.1 | 34.2 | 0.3 |
| Virginia | 9.1 | – | 14.6 | – | 17.9 | 0.2 |
| West Virginia | 15.2 | 0.2 | 26.7 | 0.3 | 17.8 | 0.2 |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 14.1 | 0.1 | 18.7 | – | 18.1 | 0.2 |
| Kentucky | 10.5 | 0.4 | 45.8 | 1.0 | S | S |
| Mississippi | 16.8 | – | 17.8 | – | 17.4 | – |
| Tennessee | 7.4 | 0.1 | 19.4 | 0.2 | 14.5 | 0.2 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | 11.9 | – | 23.1 | – | 25.6 | 0.2 |
| Louisiana | S | S | 35.7 | 0.4 | 36.7 | 1.8 |
| Oklahoma | S | S | 47.6 | – | 48.5 | 0.3 |
| Texas | 17.6 | 0.4 | 11.0 | 0.2 | 11.6 | 1.3 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 19.3 | – | 23.6 | – | 23.6 | 0.2 |
| Colorado | 31.1 | 0.1 | 24.1 | – | 23.5 | 0.2 |
| Idaho | 26.4 | – | 30.6 | – | 29.9 | – |
| Montana | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Nevada | 22.5 | – | 40.7 | – | 39.9 | 0.2 |
| New Mexico | 31.0 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Utah | 29.6 | – | 38.8 | – | 38.9 | 0.1 |
| Wyoming | 44.4 | – | S | S | S | S |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | 33.4 | – | 29.3 | – | 28.1 | – |
| California | 16.6 | 0.3 | 20.3 | 0.1 | 21.0 | 1.1 |
| Hawaii | 29.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Oregon | 9.5 | – | 14.4 | – | 14.5 | 0.1 |
| Washington | 20.7 | 0.2 | 21.4 | – | 21.7 | 0.4 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.