Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 13.8 | – | 10.3 | – | 6.4 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 46.5 | – | 35.5 | – | 36.2 | – |
| Maine | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Massachusetts | 39.3 | 0.3 | S | S | S | S |
| New Hampshire | 25.3 | – | 49.3 | – | 48.4 | – |
| RhodeIsland | 48.3 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Vermont | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 31.0 | 0.5 | 38.2 | 0.2 | 40.1 | 1.3 |
| New York | 16.6 | 0.2 | 34.6 | – | 34.6 | 0.3 |
| Pennsylvania | 27.8 | 0.3 | 29.7 | 0.1 | 33.8 | 0.6 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 18.3 | 0.5 | 14.9 | 0.1 | 15.8 | 0.3 |
| Indiana | 28.4 | 0.3 | 22.6 | – | 22.2 | 0.3 |
| Michigan | 16.9 | 0.2 | 26.4 | 0.1 | 27.2 | 0.5 |
| Ohio | 18.0 | 0.3 | 33.8 | 0.2 | 34.7 | 0.7 |
| Wisconsin | 17.6 | – | 20.4 | – | 20.7 | 0.2 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 18.4 | 0.2 | 28.9 | 0.3 | 29.9 | 0.6 |
| Kansas | 18.3 | 0.7 | 30.1 | 1.0 | 25.3 | 0.9 |
| Minnesota | 32.4 | 0.4 | 24.7 | – | 26.6 | 0.3 |
| Missouri | 27.9 | 0.2 | 24.9 | 0.5 | 20.5 | 0.7 |
| Nebraska | 17.1 | 0.2 | 27.6 | 0.3 | 29.0 | 0.8 |
| North Dakota | 31.6 | – | 29.9 | – | 32.1 | – |
| South Dakota | 32.0 | – | 49.9 | – | S | S |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| District of Columbia | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Florida | 27.4 | 0.5 | 23.8 | – | 23.8 | 0.5 |
| Georgia | 17.5 | 0.3 | 36.2 | 0.2 | 32.6 | 1.0 |
| Maryland | 31.0 | 0.3 | 21.5 | – | 21.6 | 0.2 |
| North Carolina | 12.4 | – | 18.1 | – | 21.9 | – |
| South Carolina | 19.3 | 0.2 | 33.9 | 0.1 | 32.9 | 0.5 |
| Virginia | 24.1 | 0.2 | 38.6 | – | 37.4 | 0.3 |
| West Virginia | 46.3 | – | S | S | 47.8 | 0.1 |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 24.1 | 0.2 | 37.7 | 0.2 | 36.7 | 0.6 |
| Kentucky | 18.0 | 0.1 | 25.8 | – | 24.8 | 0.2 |
| Mississippi | 20.0 | – | 36.9 | 0.1 | 35.8 | 0.2 |
| Tennessee | 12.6 | 0.3 | 40.9 | 0.5 | 46.4 | 1.3 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | 25.7 | 0.4 | 19.3 | 0.7 | 16.2 | 0.6 |
| Louisiana | 16.0 | 0.2 | 20.8 | 0.2 | 20.8 | 0.8 |
| Oklahoma | 7.2 | 2.9 | 15.4 | 3.4 | 10.0 | 1.2 |
| Texas | 44.4 | 4.0 | 14.5 | 2.2 | 7.5 | 1.6 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 17.3 | 0.2 | 27.3 | 0.1 | 30.6 | 0.4 |
| Colorado | 13.0 | 0.2 | 22.8 | 0.1 | 22.6 | 0.5 |
| Idaho | 33.6 | – | 44.5 | – | 46.2 | – |
| Montana | S | S | 34.0 | – | 33.6 | 0.2 |
| Nevada | 26.1 | – | 20.3 | – | 18.7 | – |
| New Mexico | 44.4 | 0.2 | 20.9 | – | 19.5 | 0.1 |
| Utah | 27.7 | 0.1 | 32.6 | – | 31.9 | 0.2 |
| Wyoming | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| California | 9.5 | 0.4 | 14.8 | 0.2 | 15.3 | 1.2 |
| Hawaii | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Oregon | 16.8 | 0.1 | 32.7 | – | 31.8 | 0.3 |
| Washington | 18.6 | 0.2 | 20.6 | – | 21.1 | 0.3 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.