Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 15.1 | – | 16.3 | – | 15.9 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 43.6 | – | 46.5 | – | 47.2 | 0.6 |
| Maine | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Massachusetts | 23.4 | 0.2 | 44.8 | 0.2 | 43.6 | 1.4 |
| New Hampshire | 29.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| RhodeIsland | 29.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Vermont | 21.6 | – | S | S | S | S |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 28.7 | 0.2 | 22.5 | – | 23.1 | 0.6 |
| New York | 21.3 | 0.2 | 27.1 | 0.1 | 26.9 | 0.8 |
| Pennsylvania | 17.6 | 0.1 | 32.7 | – | 32.6 | 0.3 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 18.0 | 0.3 | 23.5 | 0.3 | 24.8 | 1.2 |
| Indiana | 20.9 | 0.2 | S | S | S | S |
| Michigan | 16.6 | 0.1 | 20.2 | – | 20.3 | 0.4 |
| Ohio | 20.2 | 0.3 | S | S | S | S |
| Wisconsin | 32.5 | 0.2 | 45.5 | 0.2 | 46.6 | 1.3 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 12.0 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Kansas | 28.8 | – | 44.0 | – | 45.2 | 0.2 |
| Minnesota | 47.0 | 0.5 | 37.9 | 0.3 | 35.5 | 1.2 |
| Missouri | 35.8 | 0.3 | 43.7 | 0.4 | 44.9 | 1.1 |
| Nebraska | 49.2 | 0.1 | 43.1 | – | 43.6 | 0.3 |
| North Dakota | 42.2 | – | S | S | S | S |
| South Dakota | 36.8 | – | 48.7 | – | S | S |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | 46.7 | – | S | S | S | S |
| District of Columbia | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Florida | S | S | 32.2 | 0.1 | 32.6 | 1.0 |
| Georgia | 17.8 | 0.2 | 24.4 | – | 25.1 | 0.5 |
| Maryland | 23.7 | – | 48.7 | – | 49.2 | 0.5 |
| North Carolina | 19.3 | 0.2 | 28.2 | – | 29.7 | 0.4 |
| South Carolina | 17.4 | – | 37.6 | – | 39.3 | 0.1 |
| Virginia | 20.4 | – | 26.5 | – | 26.3 | 0.1 |
| West Virginia | 37.4 | – | 49.7 | – | 49.7 | – |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 36.4 | – | 28.9 | – | 29.0 | 0.3 |
| Kentucky | 21.0 | – | 34.0 | – | 33.2 | 0.1 |
| Mississippi | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Tennessee | 23.8 | 0.2 | 31.0 | – | 29.8 | 0.4 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | 28.5 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Louisiana | 26.9 | – | 42.2 | – | 44.1 | 0.2 |
| Oklahoma | 29.7 | – | 21.5 | – | 21.4 | 0.2 |
| Texas | 12.9 | 0.3 | 23.9 | 0.2 | 24.8 | 0.9 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 25.9 | 0.3 | 31.8 | 0.3 | 32.5 | 0.5 |
| Colorado | 17.2 | 0.2 | 38.7 | 0.2 | 33.4 | 1.0 |
| Idaho | 10.1 | 0.3 | 18.2 | 0.4 | 19.7 | 0.4 |
| Montana | 20.5 | 0.2 | 21.8 | – | 19.7 | 0.1 |
| Nevada | 14.3 | 0.1 | 22.3 | – | 21.4 | 0.2 |
| New Mexico | 22.7 | – | 46.2 | – | 48.1 | 0.1 |
| Utah | 37.8 | 0.3 | 21.8 | 0.2 | 25.1 | 0.3 |
| Wyoming | 19.4 | – | 37.9 | – | 38.1 | – |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | 19.3 | 0.1 | 28.1 | – | 34.4 | 0.2 |
| California | 33.1 | 1.9 | 13.0 | 1.6 | 14.2 | 1.3 |
| Hawaii | 37.8 | 0.1 | S | S | S | S |
| Oregon | 15.6 | 2.1 | 23.0 | 5.1 | 15.9 | 1.9 |
| Washington | 6.5 | 1.4 | 11.7 | 1.3 | 10.0 | 0.6 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.