Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 8.3 | – | 10.4 | – | 11.0 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 40.9 | 0.2 | 25.4 | – | 24.1 | 0.1 |
| Maine | 47.9 | 0.2 | S | S | S | S |
| Massachusetts | 24.3 | 0.3 | 26.4 | – | 26.9 | 0.3 |
| New Hampshire | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| RhodeIsland | 27.8 | – | 44.9 | – | 47.7 | 0.1 |
| Vermont | 27.4 | – | 41.9 | – | 41.0 | – |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 20.4 | 0.4 | 32.3 | 0.3 | 31.3 | 0.5 |
| New York | 22.9 | 0.4 | S | S | S | S |
| Pennsylvania | 39.9 | 1.1 | 14.3 | 0.3 | 15.5 | 0.7 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 20.8 | 0.3 | 44.7 | 0.4 | 43.7 | 0.9 |
| Indiana | 13.1 | 0.3 | 22.6 | 0.1 | 23.3 | 0.4 |
| Michigan | 14.8 | 0.4 | 15.6 | 0.1 | 18.0 | 0.5 |
| Ohio | 20.5 | 0.9 | 30.3 | 0.6 | 29.9 | 1.1 |
| Wisconsin | 18.0 | 0.2 | 11.5 | – | 12.1 | 0.2 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 26.8 | 0.2 | 22.6 | – | 23.6 | 0.2 |
| Kansas | 21.3 | – | 36.1 | – | 36.4 | 0.2 |
| Minnesota | 11.6 | – | 36.7 | 0.1 | 38.5 | 0.4 |
| Missouri | 11.8 | – | 24.9 | – | 23.7 | 0.3 |
| Nebraska | 35.0 | – | 30.6 | – | 30.9 | – |
| North Dakota | 29.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| South Dakota | 33.4 | – | 40.2 | – | 43.8 | – |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | 43.3 | 0.1 | 44.1 | – | 40.0 | – |
| District of Columbia | 36.2 | – | 47.5 | – | 42.1 | – |
| Florida | 19.1 | 0.6 | 10.0 | 0.3 | 11.5 | 0.5 |
| Georgia | 17.1 | 0.9 | 8.1 | 0.7 | 10.0 | 0.6 |
| Maryland | 33.3 | 0.4 | 20.2 | 0.2 | 20.6 | 0.2 |
| North Carolina | 15.0 | 1.3 | 16.8 | 1.2 | 14.5 | 1.2 |
| South Carolina | 10.5 | 2.2 | 15.1 | 3.8 | 15.0 | 1.8 |
| Virginia | 11.5 | 0.2 | 10.9 | 0.2 | 10.2 | 0.3 |
| West Virginia | 35.0 | – | 23.5 | – | 24.5 | – |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 17.2 | 0.2 | 24.4 | 0.5 | 26.1 | 0.7 |
| Kentucky | 11.3 | – | 16.0 | – | 16.6 | 0.3 |
| Mississippi | 34.7 | 0.7 | 40.2 | 0.4 | 41.2 | 0.6 |
| Tennessee | 13.5 | 0.3 | 16.5 | 0.4 | 24.5 | 0.8 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | 15.5 | – | 32.2 | – | 32.4 | 0.2 |
| Louisiana | 35.8 | 0.2 | 26.0 | – | 29.9 | 0.1 |
| Oklahoma | 21.5 | – | 20.1 | – | 23.5 | 0.2 |
| Texas | 16.1 | 0.8 | 16.8 | 0.3 | 17.7 | 1.2 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | S | S | 43.0 | – | 43.6 | 0.3 |
| Colorado | 39.2 | 0.2 | 45.2 | – | 46.1 | 0.5 |
| Idaho | 35.8 | – | 39.5 | – | 38.8 | – |
| Montana | 32.0 | – | 47.9 | – | 48.3 | – |
| Nevada | 36.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| New Mexico | 25.8 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Utah | 49.0 | 0.2 | 30.9 | – | 31.7 | 0.2 |
| Wyoming | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| California | 7.9 | 0.3 | 16.7 | 0.1 | 16.9 | 0.7 |
| Hawaii | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Oregon | 20.6 | – | 29.3 | – | 29.8 | 0.3 |
| Washington | 19.8 | – | 31.0 | – | 32.1 | 0.5 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.