Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 6.5 | – | 11.0 | – | 15.7 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 47.7 | 0.5 | 22.1 | – | 23.3 | – |
| Maine | 27.8 | – | 26.3 | – | 26.5 | 0.1 |
| Massachusetts | 25.2 | 0.3 | 19.0 | – | 19.6 | 0.1 |
| New Hampshire | 24.1 | – | 47.2 | – | 48.7 | 0.1 |
| RhodeIsland | 41.6 | – | 45.9 | – | 42.9 | 0.1 |
| Vermont | 27.6 | – | 36.8 | – | 39.6 | – |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 11.4 | – | 16.0 | – | 17.6 | 0.1 |
| New York | 14.8 | 0.3 | 12.6 | 0.1 | 10.8 | 0.3 |
| Pennsylvania | 31.8 | 0.5 | 22.4 | 0.2 | 25.1 | 0.6 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 20.9 | 0.8 | 21.2 | 0.4 | 23.0 | 0.4 |
| Indiana | 14.3 | 0.2 | 8.5 | 0.1 | 9.3 | 0.3 |
| Michigan | 10.1 | 0.5 | 23.8 | 0.2 | 26.4 | 0.3 |
| Ohio | 8.6 | 0.3 | 12.3 | 0.4 | 12.3 | 0.4 |
| Wisconsin | 21.5 | 0.3 | 26.3 | 0.1 | 28.8 | 0.3 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 17.8 | – | 30.8 | – | 30.1 | 0.1 |
| Kansas | 12.1 | – | 29.6 | – | 33.7 | – |
| Minnesota | 16.4 | 0.1 | 30.3 | – | 30.1 | 0.2 |
| Missouri | 25.5 | 0.5 | 27.5 | 0.3 | 22.8 | 0.6 |
| Nebraska | 19.2 | – | 19.9 | – | 19.6 | – |
| North Dakota | 39.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| South Dakota | 43.1 | – | 31.8 | – | 30.8 | – |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | 30.8 | 0.1 | 27.0 | – | 28.9 | – |
| District of Columbia | 28.9 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Florida | 17.5 | 0.6 | 7.7 | 0.2 | 7.6 | 0.7 |
| Georgia | 9.9 | 0.6 | 37.4 | 0.9 | 28.6 | 0.6 |
| Maryland | 45.8 | 1.5 | 11.4 | – | 11.8 | 0.1 |
| North Carolina | 9.0 | 0.4 | 18.9 | 0.5 | 17.1 | 0.7 |
| South Carolina | 8.0 | 0.2 | 36.2 | 0.4 | 36.8 | 0.9 |
| Virginia | 7.3 | 0.2 | 11.8 | 0.1 | 10.8 | 0.2 |
| West Virginia | 31.5 | 0.2 | 15.8 | – | 13.1 | 0.1 |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 10.4 | 0.3 | S | S | S | S |
| Kentucky | 13.4 | 0.6 | 25.5 | 1.0 | S | S |
| Mississippi | 7.1 | 0.2 | 23.2 | 0.6 | 30.6 | 0.4 |
| Tennessee | 6.0 | 1.6 | 15.8 | 6.3 | 11.6 | 2.5 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | 10.6 | 0.2 | 17.2 | 0.5 | 22.5 | 0.5 |
| Louisiana | 15.0 | 0.2 | 28.9 | 0.4 | 29.9 | 1.2 |
| Oklahoma | 23.4 | 0.2 | 35.3 | 0.1 | 44.3 | 0.3 |
| Texas | 17.6 | 1.0 | 29.5 | 1.1 | 26.6 | 2.3 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 37.2 | 0.3 | 38.0 | – | 39.7 | 0.2 |
| Colorado | 29.2 | 0.2 | 13.3 | – | 14.4 | – |
| Idaho | S | S | 39.4 | – | 40.1 | 0.1 |
| Montana | 31.1 | – | 49.2 | – | 47.8 | 0.1 |
| Nevada | 34.0 | – | 31.2 | – | 32.0 | 0.3 |
| New Mexico | 34.6 | – | 35.6 | – | 39.6 | 0.1 |
| Utah | 29.0 | – | 31.0 | – | 30.3 | 0.2 |
| Wyoming | 41.9 | – | 36.5 | – | 37.5 | – |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| California | 29.0 | 1.2 | 21.2 | 0.2 | 20.7 | 1.4 |
| Hawaii | S | S | S | S | S | S |
| Oregon | 18.1 | – | 34.5 | – | 33.6 | 0.2 |
| Washington | 26.8 | 0.2 | 30.4 | – | 31.9 | 0.5 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.