Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
Monday, July 2, 2012
Table B-7. Estimated Measures of Reliability for Outbound Shipment Characteristics by State of Destination for State of Origin: 2002
[Estimates are based on data from the Commodity Flow Survey. Because of rounding, estimates may not be additive]
| State of Destination | Value | Tons | Ton-miles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | CV | Std. error of percent | |
| All States | 3.7 | – | 8.0 | – | 8.0 | – |
| NEW ENGLAND STATES | ||||||
| Connecticut | 27.0 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Maine | S | S | 45.8 | – | 49.3 | – |
| Massachusetts | 28.8 | – | 14.7 | – | 14.0 | – |
| New Hampshire | S | S | 35.9 | – | 38.0 | – |
| RhodeIsland | 33.6 | – | 40.9 | – | 43.0 | – |
| Vermont | 27.4 | – | 47.3 | – | 48.7 | – |
| MIDDLE ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| New Jersey | 24.8 | 0.3 | 38.0 | 0.5 | 35.1 | 2.6 |
| New York | 34.2 | 0.4 | S | S | S | S |
| Pennsylvania | 7.7 | – | 12.3 | – | 12.1 | 0.2 |
| EAST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Illinois | 13.7 | 0.3 | 32.8 | 0.3 | 27.6 | 1.3 |
| Indiana | 16.0 | 0.1 | 14.1 | – | 16.9 | 0.3 |
| Michigan | 13.1 | 0.1 | S | S | S | S |
| Ohio | 12.7 | 0.1 | 15.2 | – | 21.3 | 0.6 |
| Wisconsin | 13.4 | – | 40.5 | – | 41.7 | 0.5 |
| WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Iowa | 24.3 | – | 27.8 | – | 28.4 | 0.2 |
| Kansas | 22.7 | 0.2 | 43.4 | 0.2 | 38.9 | 0.6 |
| Minnesota | 23.8 | 0.2 | 17.2 | – | 17.9 | 0.1 |
| Missouri | 17.0 | 0.1 | 10.7 | – | 12.0 | 0.1 |
| Nebraska | 19.6 | – | 21.3 | – | 21.6 | – |
| North Dakota | 20.1 | – | 37.1 | – | 42.6 | 0.1 |
| South Dakota | 19.4 | – | 23.5 | – | 24.8 | – |
| SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES | ||||||
| Delaware | 35.2 | – | 33.3 | – | 32.7 | – |
| District of Columbia | 27.3 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Florida | 10.7 | 0.2 | 29.7 | 0.2 | 25.5 | 0.7 |
| Georgia | 12.1 | – | 8.6 | – | 9.6 | 0.1 |
| Maryland | 24.1 | 0.1 | 40.1 | – | 39.1 | 0.3 |
| North Carolina | 25.5 | 0.2 | 5.6 | – | 9.9 | 0.3 |
| South Carolina | 21.6 | 0.1 | 34.4 | – | 39.1 | 0.7 |
| Virginia | 24.9 | 0.2 | 42.2 | – | 40.6 | 0.3 |
| West Virginia | 25.1 | – | 28.5 | – | 28.2 | – |
| EAST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Alabama | 36.5 | 0.4 | 16.8 | – | 14.5 | 0.2 |
| Kentucky | 12.2 | – | 18.7 | – | 19.3 | 0.2 |
| Mississippi | 21.9 | 0.1 | 20.5 | – | 19.5 | 0.1 |
| Tennessee | 7.3 | – | 14.8 | – | 20.4 | 0.2 |
| WEST SOUTH CENTRAL STATES | ||||||
| Arkansas | 9.0 | – | 18.5 | – | 22.7 | 0.2 |
| Louisiana | 17.2 | 0.4 | 29.5 | 0.5 | 27.0 | 0.7 |
| Oklahoma | 11.2 | 0.2 | 15.7 | 0.1 | 20.1 | 0.2 |
| Texas | 4.4 | 2.0 | 8.4 | 1.1 | 6.0 | 3.2 |
| MOUNTAIN STATES | ||||||
| Arizona | 17.6 | 0.2 | 35.6 | 0.2 | 32.7 | 0.5 |
| Colorado | 16.0 | 0.2 | 20.4 | – | 23.4 | 0.3 |
| Idaho | 27.1 | – | 29.8 | – | 32.2 | – |
| Montana | 30.5 | – | 21.4 | – | 22.5 | – |
| Nevada | 23.3 | – | 46.3 | – | 36.8 | – |
| New Mexico | 24.4 | 0.3 | 43.9 | 0.4 | 36.8 | 0.4 |
| Utah | 39.6 | 0.1 | 14.5 | – | 15.8 | – |
| Wyoming | 36.9 | – | 33.9 | – | 33.0 | – |
| PACIFIC STATES | ||||||
| Alaska | 39.7 | – | 47.1 | – | 44.4 | – |
| California | 17.8 | 0.7 | 17.2 | 0.2 | 16.0 | 0.9 |
| Hawaii | 35.1 | – | S | S | S | S |
| Oregon | 30.8 | – | 15.6 | – | 17.2 | 0.1 |
| Washington | 22.0 | 0.2 | 37.0 | – | 38.0 | 0.2 |
KEY:
– Represents data cell
equal to zero or less than 1 unit of measure.
S Estimate does not meet publication standards because of high sampling
variability or poor response quality.
CV Coefficient of variation of number
NOTE: The Introduction and appendixes give information onf confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, sample design, and definitions. Links to this information on the Internet may be found at www.census.gov/cfs.
SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics (USDOT) and U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Commodity Flow Survey, Individual State Data, December 2004.