TABLE 1-28c: Condition of Rail Transit Infrastructure
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
TABLE 1-28c: Condition of Rail Transit Infrastructure
(Percent)
1995 | 1997 | 2000 | 2002 | 2004 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stations | |||||
Excellent | 14 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
Good | 47 | 46 | 33 | 22 | 28 |
Adequate | 12 | 15 | 50 | 18 | 14 |
Substandard | 12 | 13 | 16 | 26 | 51 |
Poor | 15 | 15 | 0 | 30 | 0 |
Communication Systems | |||||
Excellent | N | 0 | 0 | 7 | 12 |
Good | N | 61 | 62 | 69 | 63 |
Adequate | N | 16 | 12 | 10 | 25 |
Substandard | N | 12 | 14 | 6 | 0 |
Poor | N | 10 | 12 | 8 | 0 |
Train Control Systems | |||||
Excellent | N | 9 | 7 | 6 | 0 |
Good | N | 52 | 56 | 66 | 45 |
Adequate | N | 16 | 17 | 11 | 29 |
Substandard | N | 11 | 10 | 10 | 14 |
Poor | N | 13 | 10 | 8 | 12 |
Traction Power Systems | |||||
Excellent | N | 25 | 21 | 37 | 8 |
Good | N | 44 | 55 | 45 | 47 |
Adequate | N | 10 | 11 | 11 | 45 |
Substandard | N | 14 | 7 | 3 | 1 |
Poor | N | 7 | 7 | 4 | 0 |
Revenue Collection Systems | |||||
Excellent | N | 27 | 30 | 34 | 26 |
Good | N | 33 | 31 | 56 | 54 |
Adequate | N | 18 | 18 | 2 | 10 |
Substandard | N | 10 | 18 | 7 | 8 |
Poor | N | 12 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
Elevated structures | |||||
Excellent | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3 |
Good | 56 | 59 | 59 | 83 | 77 |
Adequate | 16 | 12 | 16 | 3 | 4 |
Substandard | 20 | 29 | 22 | 7 | 14 |
Poor | 7 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Underground tunnels | |||||
Excellent | 9 | 7 | 12 | 40 | 26 |
Good | 59 | 47 | 46 | 34 | 48 |
Adequate | 13 | 18 | 19 | 12 | 12 |
Substandard | 11 | 19 | 11 | 9 | 6 |
Poor | 7 | 9 | 12 | 6 | 7 |
KEY: N = data do not exist.
NOTE
Percents may not add to 100 due to rounding.
SOURCE
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, Transit Economic Requirements Model.