Table 1-4: Alaska Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

(Miles)

	1995	1996	1997	1998	1999	2000
Interstate (total reported)	1,032	1,033	1,034	1,030	1,030	1,030
Very good	1	1	1	12	23	13
Good	255	310	174	238	318	333
Fair	297	292	336	337	346	313
Mediocre	386	330	424	356	297	370
Poor	93	100	99	87	46	1
Not reported	0	0	0	0	0	0
Other principal arterial (total reported)	354	355	356	354	354	353
Very good	0	0	0	6	7	7
Good	65	66	72	90	109	113
Fair	85	134	87	68	39	66
Mediocre	181	137	170	150	181	108
Poor	23	18	27	40	18	59
Not reported	456	455	454	455	455	455
Minor arterial (total reported)	160	161	228	225	225	223
Very good	0	0	0	0	0	0
Good	38	44	129	61	52	46
Fair	1	14	43	0	17	121
Mediocre	84	57	19	127	119	46
Poor	37	46	37	37	37	10
Not reported	282	281	214	212	0	0
Major collector (total reported)	N	N	N	N	N	845
Very good	N	N	N	N	N	42
Good	N	N	N	N	N	60
Fair	N	N	N	N	N	532
Mediocre	N	N	N	N	N	130
Poor	N	N	N	N	N	81
Not reported	N	N	N	N	N	0

KEY: N = Data do not exist.

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for rural major collectors using the International Roughness Index. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Servicability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.

USA Banner

Table 1-4: Alaska Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

Table 1-4: Alaska Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural