Table 1-5: California Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

	1995	1996	1997	1998	1999	2000
Interstate (total reported)	1,222	1,345	1,353	1,357	1,361	1,352
Very good	17	7	7	7	7	45
Good	550	573	608	608	613	539
Fair	229	284	299	298	302	347
Mediocre	314	401	359	364	359	314
Poor	112	80	80	80	80	107
Not reported	124	0	0	0	0	6
Other principal arterial (total reported)	3,123	3,687	3,685	3,688	3,686	3,694
Very good	35	31	32	32	31	33
Good	988	941	1,044	1,043	1,042	1,021
Fair	1,948	2,582	2,467	2,465	2,467	2,472
Mediocre	141	130	139	144	142	161
Poor	11	3	3	4	4	7
Not reported	568	0	0	0	3	5
Minor arterial (total reported)	6,867	6,904	6,905	6,900	6,905	6,970
Very good	174	359	362	298	293	34
Good	1,535	1,261	1,252	1,264	1,266	1,202
Fair	4,412	4,469	4,464	4,488	4,495	4,195
Mediocre	517	565	570	596	591	1,189
Poor	229	250	257	254	260	350
Not reported	44	0	0	0	0	0
Major collector (total reported)	N	N	N	N	N	12,692
Very good	N	N	N	N	N	95
Good	N	N	N	N	N	2,882
Fair	N	N	N	N	N	5,890
Mediocre	N	N	N	N	N	2,005
Poor	N	N	N	N	N	1,820
Not reported	N	N	N	N	N	0

KEY: N = Data do not exist

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for rural major collectors using the International Roughness Index. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Servicability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.

USA Banner

Table 1-5: California Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

Table 1-5: California Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural