Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in Connecticut: 2000
Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in Connecticut: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Interstate | Other Principal Arterial | Minor Arterial | Major Collector | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 100 | 263 | 495 | 1,156 |
| Very good | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Good | 80 | 71 | 51 | 26 |
| Fair | 13 | 178 | 418 | 792 |
| Mediocre | 5 | 12 | 26 | 211 |
| Poor | 1 | 2 | 0 | 127 |
(Percent)
| Interstate | Other principal arterial | Minor arterial | Major collector | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Very good | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Good | 80 | 27 | 10 | 2 |
| Fair | 13 | 68 | 84 | 69 |
| Mediocre | 5 | 5 | 5 | 18 |
| Poor | 1 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.