Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in Connecticut: 2000
Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in Connecticut: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
Interstate | Other Freeways & Expressways | Other Principal Arterial | Urban Minor Arterial | Urban Collector | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 246 | 198 | 607 | 810 | 148 |
Very good | 9 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Good | 97 | 59 | 23 | 3 | 6 |
Fair | 76 | 118 | 364 | 542 | 94 |
Mediocre | 45 | 10 | 132 | 228 | 39 |
Poor | 19 | 4 | 87 | 37 | 9 |
(Percent)
Interstate | Other freeways and expressways | Other principal arterial | Urban minor arterial | Urban collector | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Very good | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Good | 39 | 30 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
Fair | 31 | 60 | 60 | 67 | 64 |
Mediocre | 18 | 5 | 22 | 28 | 26 |
Poor | 8 | 2 | 14 | 5 | 6 |
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.