Table 1-3: Mississippi Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

(Miles)

	1995	1996	1997	1998	1999	2000
Interstate (total reported)	558	558	559	557	558	558
Very good	11	11	12	12	85	85
Good	201	232	223	212	230	236
Fair	160	141	147	152	114	108
Mediocre	142	144	144	152	102	102
Poor	44	30	33	29	27	27
Not reported	0	0	0	0	0	0
Other principal arterial (total reported)	1,793	1,839	1,831	1,850	1,903	1,856
Very good	5	28	15	15	168	169
Good	511	647	660	625	882	874
Fair	1,117	1,111	1,102	1,134	808	774
Mediocre	110	48	52	63	36	31
Poor	50	5	2	13	9	8
Not reported	2	0	0	0	0	43
Minor arterial (total reported)	3,920	3,910	3,915	3,918	3,869	3,834
Very good	0	6	0	0	5	21
Good	991	1,042	1,194	1,259	1,309	1,195
Fair	2,355	2,713	2,627	2,560	2,410	2,475
Mediocre	285	141	75	83	144	142
Poor	289	8	19	16	1	1
Not reported	0	0	0	0	0	0
Major collector (total reported)	N	N	N	N	N	4,751
Very good	N	N	N	N	N	143
Good	N	N	N	N	N	220
Fair	N	N	N	N	N	682
Mediocre	N	N	N	N	N	1,223
Poor	N	N	N	N	N	2,483
Not reported	N	N	N	N	N	N

KEY: N = data do not exist.

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for rural major collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.

USA Banner

Table 1-3: Mississippi Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

Table 1-3: Mississippi Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural