Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in Nevada: 2000
Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in Nevada: 2000
(Miles)
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
Interstate | Other Freeways & Expressways | Other Principal Arterial | Urban Minor Arterial | Urban Collector | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 80 | 44 | 226 | 523 | 744 |
Very good | 13 | 4 | 8 | 41 | 11 |
Good | 26 | 23 | 64 | 127 | 53 |
Fair | 21 | 17 | 110 | 232 | 228 |
Mediocre | 20 | 0 | 27 | 70 | 309 |
Poor | 0 | 0 | 17 | 53 | 143 |
(Percent)
Interstate | Other freeways and expressways | Other principal arterial | Urban minor arterial | Urban collector | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Very good | 16 | 9 | 4 | 8 | 1 |
Good | 33 | 52 | 28 | 24 | 7 |
Fair | 26 | 39 | 49 | 44 | 31 |
Mediocre | 25 | 0 | 12 | 13 | 42 |
Poor | 0 | 0 | 8 | 10 | 19 |
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.