Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in New Hampshire: 2000
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in New Hampshire: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
Interstate | Other Principal Arterial | Minor Arterial | Major Collector | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 177 | 460 | 484 | 1186 |
Very good | 26 | 57 | 69 | 27 |
Good | 147 | 233 | 167 | 275 |
Fair | 4 | 147 | 206 | 321 |
Mediocre | 0 | 9 | 14 | 346 |
Poor | 0 | 14 | 28 | 217 |
Not reported | 0 | 0 | 0 | N |
(Percent)
Interstate | Other Principal Arterial | Minor Arterial | Major Collector | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Very good | 15 | 12 | 14 | 2 |
Good | 83 | 51 | 35 | 23 |
Fair | 2 | 32 | 43 | 27 |
Mediocre | 0 | 2 | 3 | 29 |
Poor | 0 | 3 | 6 | 18 |
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.