Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in New Hampshire: 2000
Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in New Hampshire: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
Interstate | Other Freeways & Expressways | Other Principal Arterial | Urban Minor Arterial | Urban Collector | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 49 | 39 | 170 | 427 | 282 |
Very good | 13 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 12 |
Good | 30 | 23 | 51 | 78 | 37 |
Fair | 6 | 4 | 73 | 70 | 38 |
Mediocre | 0 | 2 | 21 | 137 | 78 |
Poor | 0 | 0 | 18 | 139 | 117 |
Not reported | 0 | 0 | 0 | N | N |
(Percent)
Interstate | Other Freeways & Expressways | Other Principal Arterial | Urban Minor Arterial | Urban Collector | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Very good | 27 | 26 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
Good | 61 | 59 | 30 | 18 | 13 |
Fair | 12 | 10 | 43 | 16 | 13 |
Mediocre | 0 | 5 | 12 | 32 | 28 |
Poor | 0 | 0 | 11 | 33 | 41 |
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.