Table 1-5: New Jersey Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

(Miles)

	1995	1996	1997	1998	1999	2000
Interstate (total reported)	111	112	113	113	111	120
Very good	0	0	0	0	1	1
Good	10	10	32	32	41	46
Fair	32	32	34	34	41	45
Mediocre	56	57	24	24	20	20
Poor	13	13	23	23	8	8
Not reported	6	7	6	6	9	0
Other principal arterial (total reported)	444	444	444	444	448	524
Very good	0	0	0	0	0	0
Good	20	20	43	43	36	65
Fair	387	386	264	264	322	368
Mediocre	37	38	76	76	41	42
Poor	0	0	61	61	49	49
Not reported	84	89	88	88	85	9
Minor arterial (total reported)	359	427	407	399	411	385
Very good	0	0	0	0	0	0
Good	4	4	57	65	26	15
Fair	244	295	263	240	340	314
Mediocre	76	93	38	41	13	16
Poor	35	35	49	53	32	40
Not reported	31	61	81	90	76	108
Major collector (total reported)	N	N	N	N	N	57
Very good	N	N	N	N	N	0
Good	N	N	N	N	N	22
Fair	N	N	N	N	N	35
Mediocre	N	N	N	N	N	0
Poor	N	N	N	N	N	0
Not reported	N	N	N	N	N	N

KEY: N = data do not exist.

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for rural major collectors using the International Roughness Index, if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.

USA Banner

Table 1-5: New Jersey Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

Table 1-5: New Jersey Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural