Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in North Carolina: 2000
Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in North Carolina: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Interstate | Other principal arterial | Minor arterial | Major collector | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 651 | 2,242 | 3,013 | 3,097 |
| Very good | 62 | 73 | 40 | 49 |
| Good | 289 | 1,115 | 833 | 1,092 |
| Fair | 133 | 933 | 1,798 | 1,387 |
| Mediocre | 140 | 100 | 261 | 264 |
| Poor | 27 | 21 | 81 | 305 |
(Percent)
| Interstate | Other principal arterial | Minor arterial | Major collector | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Very good | 10 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| Good | 44 | 50 | 28 | 35 |
| Fair | 20 | 42 | 60 | 45 |
| Mediocre | 22 | 4 | 9 | 9 |
| Poor | 4 | 1 | 3 | 10 |
NOTE: Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.