Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in North Carolina: 2000
Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in North Carolina: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
Interstate | Other freeways and expressways | Other principal arterial | Urban minor arterial | Urban collector | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 373 | 280 | 1,368 | 684 | 212 |
Very good | 4 | 5 | 13 | 2 | 0 |
Good | 191 | 120 | 349 | 193 | 46 |
Fair | 78 | 123 | 744 | 335 | 88 |
Mediocre | 71 | 26 | 147 | 83 | 48 |
Poor | 29 | 6 | 115 | 71 | 30 |
(Percent)
Interstate | Other freeways and expressways | Other principal arterial | Urban minor arterial | Urban collector | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Very good | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Good | 51 | 43 | 26 | 28 | 22 |
Fair | 21 | 44 | 54 | 49 | 42 |
Mediocre | 19 | 9 | 11 | 12 | 23 |
Poor | 8 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 14 |
NOTE: Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.