Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in Ohio: 2000
Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in Ohio: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Interstate | Other principal arterial | Minor arterial | Major collector | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 830 | 2,232 | 2,830 | 8,942 |
| Very good | 361 | 373 | 140 | 715 |
| Good | 368 | 1,397 | 1,959 | 5,302 |
| Fair | 86 | 443 | 701 | 2,762 |
| Mediocre | 15 | 16 | 30 | 106 |
| Poor | 0 | 3 | 0 | 57 |
(Percent)
| Interstate | Other principal arterial | Minor arterial | Major collector | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Very good | 43 | 17 | 5 | 8 |
| Good | 44 | 63 | 69 | 59 |
| Fair | 10 | 20 | 25 | 31 |
| Mediocre | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Poor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
NOTE: Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.