Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in Ohio: 2000
Figure 1-2: Urban Road Conditions in Ohio: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
Interstate | Other freeways and expressways | Other principal arterial | Urban minor arterial | Urban collector | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 742 | 392 | 1,975 | 2,190 | 967 |
Very good | 176 | 49 | 70 | 125 | 68 |
Good | 403 | 174 | 521 | 615 | 257 |
Fair | 115 | 159 | 1,046 | 1,231 | 600 |
Mediocre | 38 | 8 | 225 | 138 | 1 |
Poor | 10 | 2 | 113 | 81 | 41 |
(Percent)
Interstate | Other freeways and expressways | Other principal arterial | Urban minor arterial | Urban collector | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Very good | 24 | 13 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
Good | 54 | 44 | 26 | 28 | 27 |
Fair | 15 | 41 | 53 | 56 | 62 |
Mediocre | 5 | 2 | 11 | 6 | 0 |
Poor | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
NOTE: Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.