Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in Tennessee: 2000
Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in Tennessee: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Interstate | Other principal arterial | Minor arterial | Major collector | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 735 | 1,683 | 3,342 | N |
| Very good | 536 | 655 | 46 | N |
| Good | 190 | 861 | 1,747 | N |
| Fair | 7 | 163 | 1,369 | N |
| Mediocre | 2 | 3 | 180 | N |
| Poor | 0 | 1 | 0 | N |
(Percent)
| Interstate | Other principal arterial | Minor arterial | Major collector | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | N |
| Very good | 73 | 39 | 1 | N |
| Good | 26 | 51 | 52 | N |
| Fair | 1 | 10 | 41 | N |
| Mediocre | 0 | 0 | 5 | N |
| Poor | 0 | 0 | 0 | N |
NOTE: Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
KEY FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: N = data do not exist.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.