Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in Utah: 2000
Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Figure 1-1: Rural Road Conditions in Utah: 2000
Excel | CSV | Graphic Version
(Miles)
| Interstate | Other principal arterial | Minor arterial | Major collector | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 770 | 1,004 | 1,535 | 1,890 |
| Very good | 173 | 27 | 65 | 51 |
| Good | 367 | 448 | 349 | 360 |
| Fair | 115 | 512 | 1,104 | 1,280 |
| Mediocre | 104 | 17 | 17 | 167 |
| Poor | 11 | 0 | 0 | 32 |
(Percent)
| Interstate | Other principal arterial | Minor arterial | Major collector | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Very good | 22 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| Good | 48 | 45 | 23 | 19 |
| Fair | 15 | 51 | 72 | 68 |
| Mediocre | 14 | 2 | 1 | 9 |
| Poor | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
NOTE: Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.
SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.