Table 1-5: Vermont Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

(Miles)

	1995	1996	1997	1998	1999	2000
Interstate (total reported)	280	280	279	281	281	280
Very good	61	67	45	100	0	9
Good	148	143	171	146	200	230
Fair	57	57	24	19	31	30
Mediocre	13	13	39	16	41	4
Poor	1	0	0	0	9	7
Not reported	0	0	0	0	0	0
Other principal arterial (total reported)	318	317	316	316	316	319
Very good	15	10	10	13	0	1
Good	72	73	72	68	77	136
Fair	87	59	59	54	57	50
Mediocre	112	126	126	128	128	82
Poor	32	49	49	53	54	51
Not reported	0	0	0	0	0	0
Minor arterial (total reported)	734	734	735	735	734	733
Very good	61	48	114	21	0	3
Good	143	146	142	210	268	269
Fair	164	128	124	121	133	180
Mediocre	312	189	189	219	187	153
Poor	54	223	166	164	146	128
Not reported	0	0	0	0	0	0
Major collector (total reported)	N	N	N	N	N	1,950
Very good	N	N	N	N	N	0
Good	N	N	N	N	N	335
Fair	N	N	N	N	N	945
Mediocre	N	N	N	N	N	370
Poor	N	N	N	N	N	300
Not reported	N	N	N	N	N	0

KEY: N = data do not exist.

NOTE: In 2000, the Federal Highway Administration began reporting road condition for rural major collectors using the International Roughness Index if available. In prior years, data were only available using the Present Serviceability Rating.

NOTE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: Road condition is based on measured pavement roughness using the International Roughness Index (IRI). IRI is a measure of surface condition. A comprehensive measure of pavement condition would require data on other pavement distresses such as rutting, cracking, and faulting.

SOURCE FOR DATA ON THIS PAGE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics, Washington, DC: annual editions, tables HM-63 and HM-64, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ as of Feb. 1, 2002.

USA Banner

Table 1-5: Vermont Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural

Table 1-5: Vermont Road Condition by Functional System -- Rural