Legacy Publication

Legacy ID

1011

Show Effective Date

Significant Regulatory Guidance

Editorial Board

William Anderson, Boston University Moshe Ben-Akiva, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Kenneth Button, George Mason University Timothy Coburn, Abilene Christian University Mark Delucchi, University of California at Davis Antonio Esteve, U.S. Department of...

Table 6Statewide Site Distribution by Lane-Miles

Table 6Statewide Site Distribution by Lane-Miles Highway class Lane-miles Number of stations Percentage Total Interstates Rural 39.75 3,444 15 Urban 17.41 1,508 7 U.S. roads Rural...

Table 10Comparisons of Site Distributions for Existing and Proposed Programs

Table 10Comparisons of Site Distributions for Existing and Proposed Programs Actual stations Expected number of stations based on Proposed Existing DVMT SITE CRASH Highway class Rural interstates 13 8...

Table 9Site Distribution Based on All Crashes

Table 9Site Distribution Based on All Crashes Highway class Percentage Total Number of stations Interstates Rural 11.97 6,695 5 Urban 6.13 3,437 2 U.S. roads Rural 18.81 10...

Table 7Statewide Site Distribution by DVMT

Table 7Statewide Site Distribution by DVMT Highway class DVMT Number of stations Percentage Total miles Interstates Rural 40.74 20,469,678 15 Urban 38.41 19,298,759 15 U.S. roads...

Table 2Continuation of Speed Monitoring

Table 2Continuation of Speed Monitoring Question Response Number of responses Percentage Continue monitoring? Yes 30 97 No 1 3 Use data? Yes 29 94 No 2 6

Table 4Probability Table for the Three-Staged, Nested Factorial Mixed Effects Model

Table 4Probability Table for the Three-Staged, Nested Factorial Mixed Effects Model Source Effect Pr > F α i YEAR 0.0001 β j DIST 0.0001 χ k CLASS 0.0001 αβ ij YEAR...

Table 5Student-Newman-Keuls Test for Quarter

Table 5Student-Newman-Keuls Test for Quarter SNK grouping* Mean Quarter A 58.9 4 A 58.9 3 A 58.8 2 A 58.8 1

*Means with the same SNK groupings are not significantly different...

Table 1State Survey of Speed Monitoring Programs

Table 1State Survey of Speed Monitoring Programs Number of responses Percentage Number of stations Increase 8 16 Decrease 11 22.5 No change 19 39 Discontinued 11 22.5...

Table 3Delphi Process for Speed Monitoring Program Results

Table 3Delphi Process for Speed Monitoring Program Results Round 1 Round 2 Mean Standard Deviation Rank Mean Standard Deviation Rank Distribution criteria Spatial 31 13.8 3...

USA Banner

Legacy Publication