TABLE 2-6 Estimated Condition of Urban Bus and Rail Transit Maintenance Facilities: 2002 and 2006
Excel
2002 2006 Change from 2002 to 2006, percent Bus, number of facilitiesa 1,219 1,280 5.0 Excellent 83 210 153.0...Excel
2002 2006 Change from 2002 to 2006, percent Bus, number of facilitiesa 1,219 1,280 5.0 Excellent 83 210 153.0...Excel
2001 2006 2011 2012 Change between 2001 and 2012, percent Transit rail Commuter rail...Excel
1997 2006 Difference between 1997 and 2006, percentage points Stations Substandard 13.0 31.3 18.3...Excel
Year Age in Years Passenger cars Light trucks All light vehicles 2001 9.3 8.4 8.9 2002 9.8 9.4 9.6...Excel
2002 2007 2012 Change from 2002 to 2012, percentage points TOTAL All Bridges 590,868 599,765 607,378 0.03 Urban 135,339...Excel
Percent of Mileage with an International Roughness Index over 170
1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 Change from 1999 to 2011, percentage point RURAL...SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, National Census of Ferry Operators 2010, Available at http://www.bts.gov as of January 2014.
SOURCE: Amtrak as cited in U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, National Transportation Statistics, Table 1-44. Available at http://www.bts.gov as of September 2013.
SOURCE: Amtrak as cited in U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, National Transportation Statistics, Table 1-44. Available at http://www.bts.gov as of September 2013.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation, Office of Airline Information, Air Carrier Summary Data (Form 41 and 298C Summary Data), T-3 Data, available at http://www.bts.gov as of September 2014.